The genome sequence of a stiletto fly, Thereva unica (Harris, 1780)
Martin Drake, Chris Spilling, Alex Makunin, Benoit Nabholz, Juan Du

TL;DR
This paper provides the genome sequence of the stiletto fly Thereva unica, including a detailed assembly of its chromosomes and mitochondrial DNA.
Contribution
The novel contribution is the first genome assembly for the stiletto fly species Thereva unica.
Findings
The genome assembly spans 910.1 megabases and is scaffolded into 6 chromosomal pseudomolecules.
The mitochondrial genome is 17.66 kilobases in length and has been fully assembled.
Abstract
We present a genome assembly from an individual female Thereva unica (a stiletto fly; Arthropoda; Insecta; Diptera; Therevidae). The genome sequence is 910.1 megabases in span. Most of the assembly is scaffolded into 6 chromosomal pseudomolecules. The mitochondrial genome has also been assembled and is 17.66 kilobases in length.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5| Project accession data | ||
|---|---|---|
| Assembly identifier | idTheUnic2.1 | |
| Species |
| |
| Specimen | idTheUnic2 | |
| NCBI taxonomy ID | 2867258 | |
| BioProject | PRJEB57101 | |
| BioSample ID | SAMEA110026478 | |
| Isolate information | idTheUnic2, female: whole organism (DNA
| |
| Assembly metrics* |
| |
| Consensus quality (QV) | 58.8 |
|
|
| 99.99% |
|
| BUSCO** | C:96.1%[S:95.3%,D:0.8%],
|
|
| Percentage of
| 92.52% |
|
| Sex chromosomes | Not identified |
|
| Organelles | Mitochondrial genome: 17.66 kb |
|
| Raw data accessions | ||
| PacificBiosciences
| ERR10439745 | |
| Hi-C Illumina | ERR10446380 | |
| Genome assembly | ||
| Assembly accession | GCA_949987705.1 | |
|
| GCA_949987715.1 | |
| Span (Mb) | 910.1 | |
| Number of contigs | 1865 | |
| Contig N50 length (Mb) | 2.2 | |
| Number of scaffolds | 940 | |
| Scaffold N50 length (Mb) | 167.4 | |
| Longest scaffold (Mb) | 258.85 | |
| INSDC
| Chromosome | Length (Mb) | GC% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 258.85 | 38.5 | |
| 2 | 168.33 | 38.5 | |
| 3 | 167.37 | 38.5 | |
| 4 | 118.71 | 39.0 | |
| 5 | 102.3 | 39.0 | |
| 6 | 26.59 | 40.0 | |
| MT | 0.02 | 23.0 |
| Software tool | Version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| BlobToolKit | 4.2.1 |
|
| BUSCO | 5.3.2 |
|
| Hifiasm | 0.16.1-r375 |
|
| HiGlass | 1.11.6 |
|
| Merqury | MerquryFK |
|
| MitoHiFi | 2 |
|
| PretextView | 0.2 |
|
| purge_dups | 1.2.3 |
|
| sanger-tol/genomenote | v1.0 |
|
| sanger-tol/readmapping | 1.1.0 |
|
| YaHS | yahs-1.1.91eebc2 |
|
- —Wellcome Trust
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDiptera species taxonomy and behavior · Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies · Insect behavior and control techniques
Species taxonomy
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Eumetazoa; Bilateria; Protostomia; Ecdysozoa; Panarthropoda; Arthropoda; Mandibulata; Pancrustacea; Hexapoda; Insecta; Dicondylia; Pterygota; Neoptera; Endopterygota; Diptera; Brachycera; Muscomorpha; Asiloidea; Therevidae; Therevinae; Thereva ( Harris, 1780) (NCBI:txid2867258).
Background
Thereva unica ( Harris, 1780) is a member of the Therevidae (Diptera), known as stiletto flies on account of their conical abdomen. Short pubescence covers most of the body and in some species is brilliant silver but in T. unica is drab brown. This species was long known in Britain as T. bipunctata Meigen, 1820 as there was uncertainty over the identity of Harris’s species ( Chandler, 1998). His painting is unhelpful, but his description of the female’s frons with its two shining black spots is accurate ( Harris, 1780) and is similar only in occasional specimens of two rare British species and of the common T. nobilitata (Fabricius). On balance it seems likely that Harris’s specimen was the same as Meigen’s T. bipunctata. Species of Thereva can be difficult to name accurately, so the genome will help clarify the taxonomy. Larvae of Thereva cannot be identified using morphology so genomic identification will aid ecological research of this life stage.
Thereva unica is found on fixed dunes on the coast from Cumbria to Yorkshire, with disjunct populations in Scotland, including the Outer Hebrides. Inland it is found in dry sandy heaths in the Surrey area, the Breckland of East Anglia and isolated heaths elsewhere in England.
Therevid larvae are long, thin, and fairly featureless, but are remarkable for possessing a smooth dry cuticle which aids their ‘swimming’ through particulate substrates, rather like a stiff eel. They are hunting predators, detecting their prey by its vibrations and subduing it rapidly with a venom ( Smith, 1989; Stubbs & Drake, 2014). They are probably unspecific in their choice of prey, taking any other arthropods and worms although Irwin and Lyneborg (1981) state that beetle larvae are preferred. In related species living in dry sand, prey captured on the surface is dragged back into the sand (MD, pers. obs.). The feeding behaviour of adults is unclear but males of some species of Thereva swarm, so an energy intake would be necessary.
Genome sequence report
The genome was sequenced from one female Thereva unica ( Figure 1) collected from Loe Valley (River Cober), England, UK (50.09, –5.29). A total of 36-fold coverage in Pacific Biosciences single-molecule HiFi long reads was generated. Primary assembly contigs were scaffolded with chromosome conformation Hi-C data. Manual assembly curation corrected 249 missing joins or mis-joins and removed 48 haplotypic duplications, reducing the assembly length by 2.35% and the scaffold number by 18.25%, and increasing the scaffold N50 by 70.63%.
Photograph of the Thereva unica (idTheUnic2) specimen used for genome sequencing.
The final assembly has a total length of 910.1 Mb in 940 sequence scaffolds with a scaffold N50 of 167.4 Mb ( Table 1). The snailplot in Figure 2 provides a summary of the assembly statistics, while the distribution of assembly scaffolds on GC proportion and coverage is shown in Figure 3. The cumulative assembly plot in Figure 4 shows curves for subsets of scaffolds assigned to different phyla. Most (92.52%) of the assembly sequence was assigned to 6 chromosomal-level scaffolds, representing 6 autosomes. Chromosome-scale scaffolds confirmed by the Hi-C data are named in order of size ( Figure 5; Table 2). The exact order and orientation of the scaffolds in the repetitive centromeres is unknown. As it is a female XX sample without a comparator species, the X chromosome is unidentified. While not fully phased, the assembly deposited is of one haplotype. Contigs corresponding to the second haplotype have also been deposited. The mitochondrial genome was also assembled and can be found as a contig within the multifasta file of the genome submission.
Table 1.: Genome data for Thereva unica, idTheUnic2.1.
Genome assembly of Thereva unica, idTheUnic2.1: metrics.The BlobToolKit Snailplot shows N50 metrics and BUSCO gene completeness. The main plot is divided into 1,000 size-ordered bins around the circumference with each bin representing 0.1% of the 910,162,612 bp assembly. The distribution of scaffold lengths is shown in dark grey with the plot radius scaled to the longest scaffold present in the assembly (258,850,354 bp, shown in red). Orange and pale-orange arcs show the N50 and N90 scaffold lengths (167,368,244 and 26,588,518 bp), respectively. The pale grey spiral shows the cumulative scaffold count on a log scale with white scale lines showing successive orders of magnitude. The blue and pale-blue area around the outside of the plot shows the distribution of GC, AT and N percentages in the same bins as the inner plot. A summary of complete, fragmented, duplicated and missing BUSCO genes in the diptera_odb10 set is shown in the top right. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/idTheUnic2_1/dataset/idTheUnic2_1/snail.
Genome assembly of Thereva unica, idTheUnic2.1: BlobToolKit GC-coverage plot.Scaffolds are coloured by phylum. Circles are sized in proportion to scaffold length. Histograms show the distribution of scaffold length sum along each axis. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/idTheUnic2_1/dataset/idTheUnic2_1/blob.
Genome assembly of Thereva unica, idTheUnic2.1: BlobToolKit cumulative sequence plot.The grey line shows cumulative length for all scaffolds. Coloured lines show cumulative lengths of scaffolds assigned to each phylum using the buscogenes taxrule. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/idTheUnic2_1/dataset/idTheUnic2_1/cumulative.
Genome assembly of Thereva unica, idTheUnic2.1: Hi-C contact map of the idTheUnic2.1 assembly, visualised using HiGlass.Chromosomes are shown in order of size from left to right and top to bottom. An interactive version of this figure may be viewed at https://genome-note-higlass.tol.sanger.ac.uk/l/?d=IU_qBrpWToWNrAiItglZPA.
Table 2.: Chromosomal pseudomolecules in the genome assembly of Thereva unica, idTheUnic2.
The estimated Quality Value (QV) of the final assembly is 58.8 with k-mer completeness of 99.99%, and the assembly has a BUSCO v5.3.2 completeness of 96.1% (single = 95.3%, duplicated = 0.8%), using the diptera_odb10 reference set ( n = 3,285).
Metadata for specimens, barcode results, spectra estimates, sequencing runs, contaminants and pre-curation assembly statistics are given at https://links.tol.sanger.ac.uk/species/2867258.
Methods
Sample acquisition and nucleic acid extraction
Thereva unica specimens was collected using an aerial net from Loe Valley (River Cober), England, UK (latitude 50.09, longitude –5.29) on 2021-06-29. The specimens were collected by Martin Drake and identified by Chris Spilling (both of the Dipterists Forum) and preserved by dry freezing at –80°C. The sample with specimen ID NHMUK014537453 (ToLID idTheUnic2), a female, was used for DNA sequencing was, and the sample with specimen ID NHMUK014537421 (ToLID idTheUnic1), a male, was used for Hi-C sequencing.
The workflow for high molecular weight (HMW) DNA extraction at the Wellcome Sanger Institute (WSI) includes a sequence of core procedures: sample preparation; sample homogenisation, DNA extraction, fragmentation, and clean-up. The sample was prepared for DNA extraction in the Tree of Life core laboratory. The idTheUnic2 sample was weighed and dissected on dry ice ( Jay et al., 2023). Tissue from the whole organism was homogenised using a PowerMasher II tissue disruptor ( Denton et al., 2023a). HMW DNA was extracted in the WSI Scientific Operations core using the Automated MagAttract v2 protocol ( Oatley et al., 2023). HMW DNA was sheared into an average fragment size of 12–20 kb in a Megaruptor 3 system with speed setting 31 ( Bates et al., 2023). Sheared DNA was purified by solid-phase reversible immobilisation ( Strickland et al., 2023): in brief, the method employs a 1.8X ratio of AMPure PB beads to sample to eliminate shorter fragments and concentrate the DNA. The concentration of the sheared and purified DNA was assessed using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer and Qubit Fluorometer and Qubit dsDNA High Sensitivity Assay kit. Fragment size distribution was evaluated by running the sample on the FemtoPulse system.
Protocols developed by the WSI Tree of Life core laboratory are available on protocols.io ( Denton et al., 2023b).
Sequencing
Pacific Biosciences HiFi circular consensus DNA sequencing libraries were constructed according to the manufacturers’ instructions. DNA sequencing was performed by the Scientific Operations core at the WSI on a Pacific Biosciences SEQUEL II instrument. Hi-C data were also generated from head and thorax tissue of idTheUnic1 using the Arima2 kit and sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 instrument.
Genome assembly, curation and evaluation
Assembly was carried out with Hifiasm ( Cheng et al., 2021) and haplotypic duplication was identified and removed with purge_dups ( Guan et al., 2020). The assembly was then scaffolded with Hi-C data ( Rao et al., 2014) using YaHS ( Zhou et al., 2023). The assembly was checked for contamination and corrected as described previously ( Howe et al., 2021). Manual curation was performed using HiGlass ( Kerpedjiev et al., 2018) and Pretext ( Harry, 2022). The mitochondrial genome was assembled using MitoHiFi ( Uliano-Silva et al., 2023), which runs MitoFinder ( Allio et al., 2020) or MITOS ( Bernt et al., 2013) and uses these annotations to select the final mitochondrial contig and to ensure the general quality of the sequence.
A Hi-C map for the final assembly was produced using bwa-mem2 ( Vasimuddin et al., 2019) in the Cooler file format ( Abdennur & Mirny, 2020). To assess the assembly metrics, the k-mer completeness and QV consensus quality values were calculated in Merqury ( Rhie et al., 2020). This work was done using Nextflow ( Di Tommaso et al., 2017) DSL2 pipelines “sanger-tol/readmapping” ( Surana et al., 2023a) and “sanger-tol/genomenote” ( Surana et al., 2023b). The genome was analysed within the BlobToolKit environment ( Challis et al., 2020) and BUSCO scores ( Manni et al., 2021; Simão et al., 2015) were calculated.
Table 3 contains a list of relevant software tool versions and sources.
Wellcome Sanger Institute – Legal and Governance
The materials that have contributed to this genome note have been supplied by a Darwin Tree of Life Partner. The submission of materials by a Darwin Tree of Life Partner is subject to the ‘Darwin Tree of Life Project Sampling Code of Practice’, which can be found in full on the Darwin Tree of Life website here. By agreeing with and signing up to the Sampling Code of Practice, the Darwin Tree of Life Partner agrees they will meet the legal and ethical requirements and standards set out within this document in respect of all samples acquired for, and supplied to, the Darwin Tree of Life Project.
Further, the Wellcome Sanger Institute employs a process whereby due diligence is carried out proportionate to the nature of the materials themselves, and the circumstances under which they have been/are to be collected and provided for use. The purpose of this is to address and mitigate any potential legal and/or ethical implications of receipt and use of the materials as part of the research project, and to ensure that in doing so we align with best practice wherever possible. The overarching areas of consideration are:
• Ethical review of provenance and sourcing of the material
• Legality of collection, transfer and use (national and international)
Each transfer of samples is further undertaken according to a Research Collaboration Agreement or Material Transfer Agreement entered into by the Darwin Tree of Life Partner, Genome Research Limited (operating as the Wellcome Sanger Institute), and in some circumstances other Darwin Tree of Life collaborators.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Abdennur N Mirny LA : Cooler: Scalable storage for Hi-C data and other genomically labeled arrays. Bioinformatics. 2020;36(1):311–316. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz 540 31290943 PMC 8205516 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Allio R Schomaker-Bastos A Romiguier J : Mito Finder: Efficient automated large-scale extraction of mitogenomic data in target enrichment phylogenomics. Mol Ecol Resour. 2020;20(4):892–905. 10.1111/1755-0998.13160 32243090 PMC 7497042 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Bates A Clayton-Lucey I Howard C : Sanger Tree of Life HMW DNA Fragmentation: Diagenode Megaruptor ®3 for LI Pac Bio. protocols.io. 2023. 10.17504/protocols.io.81wgbxzq 3lpk/v 1 · doi ↗
- 4Bernt M Donath A Jühling F : MITOS: Improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013;69(2):313–319. 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.08.023 22982435 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Challis R Richards E Rajan J : Blob Tool Kit - interactive quality assessment of genome assemblies. G 3 (Bethesda). 2020;10(4):1361–1374. 10.1534/g 3.119.400908 32071071 PMC 7144090 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Chandler PJ : Checklists of insects of the British Isles (New Series) Part 1: Diptera (incorporating a list of Irish Diptera). Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects 12. London: Royal Entomological Society,1998.
- 7Cheng H Concepcion GT Feng X : Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat Methods. 2021;18(2):170–175. 10.1038/s 41592-020-01056-5 33526886 PMC 7961889 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Denton A Oatley G Cornwell C : Sanger Tree of Life Sample Homogenisation: Power Mash. protocols.io. 2023 a. 10.17504/protocols.io.5qpvo 3r 19v 4o/v 1 · doi ↗
