Correction to: Does behavioural parent training reduce internalising symptoms (or not) among children with externalising problems? Systematic review and meta-analysis
Christy Bloss, Sophie Brown, Vilas Sawrikar
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFamily and Disability Support Research
Correction to: European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 10.1007/s00787-022-02122-3
In the original publication, there were errors in Table 3.
The correct Table 3 is provided below:Table 3. Moderation analysis of treatment effect of BPT on internalising outcomeskHedges’ g95% CIHeterogeneity (I^2^) (%)SignificanceTest for subgroup differencesInternalising scores High4 − 0.62(− 0.96, − 0.27)48P = 0.0005P = 0.17 Low12 − 0.34(− 0.52, − 0.17)39P = 0.0001Outcome measures SDQ5 − 0.36(− 0.61, − 0.11)20P = 0.005P = 0.68 CBCL11 − 0.43(− 0.64, − 0.22)54P = 0.0001Treatment format Group13 − 0.33(− 0.49, − 0.18)28P = 0.0001P = 0.08 Individual3 − 0.82(− 1.34, − 0.30)64P = 0.002Child age 2–611 − 0.37(− 0.56, − 0.17)47P = 0.0002P = 0.43 7–125 − 0.52(− 0.83, − 0.20)49P = 0.001Programme IY5 − 0.35(− 0.56, − 0.14)7P = 0.001P = 0.26 TP4 − 0.46(− 0.74, − 0.19)15P = 0.001 PCIT3 − 0.82(− 1.34, − 0.30)64P = 0.002Risk of bias No risk of bias6 − 0.32(− 0.57, − 0.08)34P = 0.01P = 0.42 Any risk of bias10 − 0.46(− 0.67, − 0.24)49P = 0.0001k number of studies, CI confidence interval, P significance level < 0.05
The Original article has been corrected.