Risk perception and use of personal care products by race and ethnicity among a diverse population
Julia Mandeville, Zeina Alkhalaf, Charlotte Joannidis, Michelle Ryan, Devon Nelson, Lesliam Quiros-Alcala, Matthew O. Gribble, Anna Z. Pollack

TL;DR
The study explores how race and ethnicity influence personal care product use and risk perception, revealing significant differences in usage patterns and safety concerns.
Contribution
The paper provides new insights into racial and ethnic disparities in personal care product use and risk perception, highlighting potential exposure differences to endocrine-disrupting chemicals.
Findings
Non-Hispanic Black participants reported the highest daily use of hairstyling products and lotion.
Middle Eastern and North African participants most frequently used makeup and skincare products daily.
There were significant differences in product use frequency, safety perception, and trust by race and ethnicity.
Abstract
Personal care products can contain phthalates, parabens and other endocrine-disrupting chemicals. However, information on perception of risks from personal care product use and how use varies by race and ethnicity is limited. We evaluated differences in personal care product use and risk perception in a diverse sample of participants recruited from a US college campus and online. A self-administered questionnaire captured information on sociodemographic factors, personal care product use trends and perception of risk associated with them. Pearson’s chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used to determine differences in personal care product use and risk perception by race and ethnicity. Ordered logistic regressions were performed to measure associations between personal care product use frequency across racial/ethnic categories. Participant (n = 770) mean age was 22.8 years [standard…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsReproductive Health and Technologies
