Clinical outcomes for olfactory neuroblastoma
Akira Nakazono, Hiroaki Motegi, Masanobu Suzuki, Yuji Nakamaru, Shigeru Yamaguchi, Yukitomo Ishi, Satoshi Kano, Nayuta Tsushima, Aya Honma, Takayoshi Suzuki, Shogo Kimura, Seijiro Hamada, Jun Taguchi, Yasushi Shimizu, Takashi Mori, Koichi Yasuda, Hidefumi Aoyama

TL;DR
This study evaluates treatment outcomes for olfactory neuroblastoma, finding that endoscopic surgery leads to better recovery and fewer complications.
Contribution
The paper presents a treatment protocol for olfactory neuroblastoma with detailed clinical outcomes and comparative surgical results.
Findings
Endoscopic surgery resulted in shorter operating times and less blood loss compared to craniotomy combined with endoscopic surgery.
The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 92.9% and 82.5%, respectively, with favorable local control rates.
Patients undergoing endoscopic resection had better perioperative outcomes and lower complication rates.
Abstract
Olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) is a rare malignant tumor arising from the olfactory neuroepithelium. The standard of care for ONB is surgical resection; however, detailed treatment protocols vary by institution. Our treatment protocol consists of endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS) for endoscopically resectable cases and induction chemotherapy followed by craniotomy combined with ESBS for locally advanced cases, with postoperative radiotherapy performed for all cases. Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is performed in unresectable cases. In this study, we evaluate our treatment protocol and outcomes for ONB. A retrospective review of patients with ONB was conducted. Outcomes included survival outcomes and perioperative data. Fifteen patients (53.6%) underwent ESBS, 12 (42.9%) underwent craniotomy combined with ESBS, and 1 (3.6%) received CRT. The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates for all…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSocial and Educational Sciences · Cultural Industries and Urban Development
