Correction: Highly accurate prediction of flammability limits of chemical compounds using novel integrated hybrid models
Mohanad El-Harbawi, Brahim Belhaouari Samir, Lahssen El blidi, Ouahid Ben Ghanem
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsThermal and Kinetic Analysis · Energetic Materials and Combustion · Computational Drug Discovery Methods
In the LFL prediction accuracy and validation subsection of the Results and discussion section, there is an error in Eq. (12). The correct Eq. (12) is: LFL = 0.5644 + 12.5173 (SIC0) ˗ 2.2022 (AAC + PW5) + 0.5902 (AAC) (AAC + PW5) ˗ 4.766 (SIC0) (AAC + PW5) ˗ 36.902 (PW5^2^) (AAC + PW5) + 4.4465 (SIC0^2^) (AAC + PW5) + 2.1331 (SIC0^2^) (SIC0 + GATS1v) ˗ 4.3963 (SIC0^3^) (SIC0 + GATS1v) + 215.3612 (PW5^3^) (AAC + PW5) + 0.0181 (AAC +PW5) (SIC0^3^) ˗ 20.4864 (SIC0+PW5) (PW5^2^) + 11.0002 (SIC0+GATS1v) (PW5^2^).
Eq. (12) also appears incorrectly in S3 Table. It should read: LFL = 0.5644 + 12.5173 (SIC0) ˗ 2.2022 (AAC + PW5) + 0.5902 (AAC) (AAC + PW5) ˗ 4.766 (SIC0) (AAC + PW5) ˗ 36.902 (PW5^2^) (AAC + PW5) + 4.4465 (SIC0^2^) (AAC + PW5) + 2.1331 (SIC0^2^) (SIC0 + GATS1v) ˗ 4.3963 (SIC0^3^) (SIC0 + GATS1v) + 215.3612 (PW5^3^) (AAC + PW5) + 0.0181 (AAC +PW5) (SIC0^3^) ˗ 20.4864 (SIC0+PW5) (PW5^2^) + 11.0002 (SIC0+GATS1v) (PW5^2^). The table of coefficients in S3 Table contains errors as well. Please see the correct S3 Table here.
Supporting information
S3 TableResults comparison for the Pan et al. [37] dataset.(XLS)
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.