# Mutational and structural studies of (βα)8‐barrel fold methylene‐tetrahydropterin reductases utilizing a common catalytic mechanism

## TL;DR

This paper studies how different enzymes use a similar mechanism to perform a key chemical reaction in one-carbon metabolism.

## Contribution

The study reveals a common catalytic mechanism across three reductases despite low sequence similarity.

## Key findings

- A 5-iminum cation intermediate is involved in the catalytic mechanism of all three reductases.
- A shared glutamate residue protonates the intermediate in the reaction.
- The enzymes likely evolved through convergent development rather than from a common ancestor.

## Abstract

Methylene‐tetrahydropterin reductases catalyze the reduction of a methylene to a methyl group bound to a reduced pterin as C1 carrier in various one‐carbon (C1) metabolisms. F420‐dependent methylene‐tetrahydromethanopterin (methylene‐H4MPT) reductase (Mer) and the flavin‐independent methylene‐tetrahydrofolate (methylene‐H4F) reductase (Mfr) use a ternary complex mechanism for the direct transfer of a hydride from F420H2 and NAD(P)H to the respective methylene group, whereas FAD‐dependent methylene‐H4F reductase (MTHFR) uses FAD as prosthetic group and a ping–pong mechanism to catalyze the reduction of methylene‐H4F. A ternary complex structure and a thereof derived catalytic mechanism of MTHFR is available, while no ternary complex structures of Mfr or Mer are reported. Here, Mer from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii (jMer) was heterologously produced and the crystal structures of the enzyme with and without F420 were determined. A ternary complex of jMer was modeled on the basis of the jMer‐F420 structure and the ternary complex structure of MTHFR by superimposing the polypeptide after fixing hydride‐transferring atoms of the flavins on each other, and by the subsequent transfer of the methyl‐tetrahydropterin from MTHFR to jMer. Mutational analysis of four functional amino acids, which are similarly positioned in the three reductase structures, indicated despite the insignificant sequence identity, a common catalytic mechanism with a 5‐iminium cation of methylene‐tetrahydropterin as intermediate protonated by a shared glutamate. According to structural, mutational and phylogenetic analysis, the evolution of the three reductases most likely proceeds via a convergent development although a divergent scenario requiring drastic structural changes of the common ancestor cannot be completely ruled out.