# Comparison of the Stress and Anxiety to Viral Epidemic-9 and SAVE-6 scales among healthcare workers in Peru

**Authors:** Bryan Gamonal, Rogelio Quispe-Lizano, Nair Javier-Murillo, André Lapeyre-Rivera, Francisco Perea-Flórez, Víctor Velásquez-Rimachi, Carlos Alva-Diaz, Gilberth Velazco-Gonzales, Oli Ahmed, Seockhoon Chung

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1352896 · 2024-05-01

## TL;DR

This study validates two scales for measuring anxiety and stress in healthcare workers in Peru during viral epidemics.

## Contribution

The Peruvian-Spanish versions of the SAVE-9 and SAVE-6 scales were validated and compared for reliability and validity.

## Key findings

- SAVE-9 and SAVE-6 showed excellent fit in confirmatory factor analysis and strong internal consistency.
- Both scales correlated significantly with established anxiety and depression measures.
- Optimal cutoff points for anxiety detection were identified for both scales.

## Abstract

Peru is a country that has a high incidence of viral outbreaks and epidemics, which is why it is necessary to validate a scale that measures anxiety and stress in professionals who are on the front lines of these events. Therefore, our objective was to validate the Peruvian-Spanish version of the Stress and Anxiety to Viral Epidemics-9 items (SAVE-9) scale and to concurrently compare its validity and internal consistency with the SAVE-6 scale among healthcare workers (HCWs).

We conducted a cross-sectional study based on data collected from a self-reported survey in paper-and-pencil format between April and July 2023. A total of 203 HCWs participated in the research. We developed a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and item response theory (IRT). We calculated Cronbach’s α coefficient and McDonald’s ω to assess the internal consistency of the scales.

The results show that SAVE-9 (a two-factor model) and SAVE-6 (a one-factor model) provided an excellent fit in the confirmatory factor analysis. Both scales demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s α 0.85 and 0.86, respectively). Significant correlations were found between the SAVE-9 and SAVE-6 scales and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 items scale (r = 0.44 and r = 0.38, respectively, p < 0.001) as well as the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 items (r = 0.39 and r = 0.35, respectively, p < 0.001). The optimal cutoff points for SAVE-9 and SAVE-6 were identified for assessing anxiety, aligned with a GAD-7 score ≥5 points.

The Peruvian-Spanish SAVE-9 and SAVE-6 scales are reliable and valid rating scales to assess the anxiety response of HCWs in response to viral epidemics. Though COVID-19 is diminished, these scales will be useful for other viral epidemics in the future.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** COVID-19 (MONDO:0100096)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382), Anxiety (MESH:D001007), GAD-7 (MESH:C537955), Generalized Anxiety Disorder (MESH:C000726808), Stress (MESH:D000079225)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11094251/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11094251