Implementing narrow banding imaging with dual focus magnification for histological prediction of small rectosigmoid polyps in Vietnamese setting
Tien Manh Huynh, Quang Dinh Le, Nhan Quang Le, Huy Minh Le, Duc Trong Quach

TL;DR
This study shows that using narrow band imaging with dual focus magnification improves accuracy in predicting small rectosigmoid polyps' neoplastic status, supporting a safer and cost-effective 'diagnose-and-leave' strategy.
Contribution
The study introduces dual focus magnification with narrow band imaging for real-time diagnosis of small rectosigmoid polyps in a Vietnamese setting.
Findings
NBI with dual focus magnification significantly increased high-confidence optical diagnoses for diminutive polyps.
The 'diagnose-and-leave' strategy could reduce 58.2% of unnecessary polypectomies without missing advanced neoplastic lesions.
WLE + NBI + NBI-DF achieved 90.1% sensitivity and 95.5% specificity in high-confidence predictions.
Abstract
Small rectosigmoid colorectal polyps (<10 mm) are prevalent, with a low prevalence of advanced neoplastic lesions. The “diagnose‐and‐leave” strategy, employing narrow band imaging (NBI), is gaining popularity for its safety and cost‐effectiveness by reducing polypectomy complications and minimizing histopathology expenses. This study assessed the diagnostic efficacy of NBI with dual focus (DF) magnification for real‐time neoplastic prediction of rectosigmoid polyps and explored the feasibility of implementing this strategy in Vietnam. In a prospective single‐center study, 307 rectosigmoid polyps from 245 patients were analyzed using three consecutive endoscopic modes: white light endoscopy (WLE), NBI, and NBI‐DF. Endoscopists assessed polyps for size, location, macroscopic shape, optical diagnosis, and confidence levels before histopathological evaluation. High confidence was assigned…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsColorectal Cancer Screening and Detection · Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments · Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
