# Welfare effect analysis of pay-as-you-go pension system: Deconstruction from the perspective of relative utility and social equality

**Authors:** Jin Hu, Peter J. Stauvermann

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296334 · PLOS ONE · 2024-05-10

## TL;DR

This paper analyzes how two pension systems affect welfare, showing that each has trade-offs between consumption levels and social equality.

## Contribution

The study introduces a model combining standard and relative utility to evaluate pension systems' redistributive effects.

## Key findings

- Both pension systems are sustainable but differ in long-term consumption and inequality outcomes.
- Beveridgean system supports vulnerable groups better but leads to lower overall consumption.
- Bismarckian system offers higher consumption but increases poverty risk for disadvantaged groups.

## Abstract

This paper studies the redistributive effects of two major pay-as-you-go pension systems by constructing an intergenerational iterative model which does not only considers standard utility but also relative utility. The study find that the two main pay-as-you-go pension systems are both sustainable. If we consider different preferences, then the choice of pension system should depend on the question of whether individuals are more interested in the absolute level of consumption or in the consumption related to a reference group. If the latter is more important, the Beveridgean system is superior, it provides greater protection for vulnerable groups than the Bismarck pension system, and the pension income after retirement is relatively more balanced, but the price is a lower level of consumption in the long run compared to an economy with Bismarckian system. If individuals prefer instead the absolute level of consumption, the Bismarckian system is better, because it guarantees a comparable higher level of consumption, but the disadvantaged groups face a higher risk of poverty and the degree of social inequality will be relatively higher. However, it is important to note that in the long run, only the level of consumption differs, not the speed of growth or number of children.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** malnourishment (MESH:D044342)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11086903/full.md

## Figures

50 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11086903/full.md

## References

32 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11086903/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11086903