Association Analysis of Essential Tremor-Associated Genetic Variants in Sporadic Late-Onset Parkinson’s Disease
Sheng Zeng, Xun Zhou, Runcheng He, Yuwen Zhao, Zhenhua Liu, Qian Xu, Jifeng Guo, Xinxiang Yan, Jinchen Li, Beisha Tang, Qiying Sun

TL;DR
This study investigated if genetic variants linked to essential tremor are also associated with late-onset Parkinson’s disease, but found no significant connections.
Contribution
The novel contribution is the first exploration of ET-associated genetic loci in sporadic late-onset PD using whole-genome sequencing in a Chinese cohort.
Findings
No significant association was found between ET-associated SNPs and late-onset PD.
Rare deleterious variants in ET-associated genes did not show a significant burden in late-onset PD risk.
Abstract
Parkinson’s disease (PD) and Essential tremor (ET) are the two most common tremor diseases with recognized genetic pathogenesis. The overlapping clinical features suggest they may share genetic predispositions. Our previous study systematically investigated the association between rare coding variants in ET-associated genes and early-onset PD (EOPD), and found the suggestive association between teneurin transmembrane protein 4 (TENM4) and EOPD. In the current research, we explored the potential genetic interplay between ET-associated genetic loci/genes and sporadic late-onset PD (LOPD). We performed whole-genome sequencing in the 1962 sporadic LOPD cases and 1279 controls from mainland China. We first used logistic regression analysis to test the top 16 SNPs identified by the ET genome-wide association study for the association between ET and LOPD. Then we applied the optimized…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNP | GENE/LOCUS | POSITION (hg19) | MINOR ALLELE | MAJOR ALLELE |
|
| ||||
| rs1127215 |
| 1:117532790 | T | C |
|
| ||||
| rs703174 |
| 3:157493146 | T | C |
|
| ||||
| rs10937625 |
| 4:5128159 | C | T |
|
| ||||
| rs17590046 |
| 4:24362541 | C | T |
|
| ||||
| rs28562175 |
| 5:67827456 | T | C |
|
| ||||
| rs10812774 |
| 9:28294231 | C | T |
|
| ||||
| rs1412229 |
| 9:28478305 | T | A |
|
| ||||
| rs7033345 |
| 9:28717573 | G | T |
|
| ||||
| rs12764057 |
| 10:68845715 | G | T |
|
| ||||
| rs10822974 |
| 10:68850419 | G | A |
|
| ||||
| rs7903491 |
| 10:68917164 | A | G |
|
| ||||
| rs3794087 |
| 11:35329615 | T | G |
|
| ||||
| rs9652490 |
| 15:77963887 | G | A |
|
| ||||
| rs11856808 |
| 15:77972770 | T | C |
|
| ||||
| rs1945016 |
| 18:37207175 | G | T |
|
| ||||
| rs9980363 |
| 21:42520134 | C | T |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CASE (n) | CONTROL (n) | VARIANTS GROUP | (a) MAF < 1% | (b) MAF < 3% | ||
|
|
| |||||
| N |
| N |
| |||
|
| ||||||
| 1962 | 1279 | All | 1466 | 0.476 | 1494 | 0.262 |
|
| ||||||
| LoF | 30 | 0.415 | 30 | 0.415 | ||
|
| ||||||
| Missense | 898 | 0.317 | 911 | 0.295 | ||
|
| ||||||
| Dmis | 288 | 0.472 | 294 | 0.383 | ||
|
| ||||||
| LoF + Dmis | 318 | 0.442 | 324 | 0.359 | ||
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GENES | LoF + DMIS | LoF | Dmis | |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| n |
| n |
| n |
| |
|
| ||||||
|
| 1 | 0.467 | – | – | 1 | 0.467 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 5 | 0.246 | – | – | 5 | 0.246 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 8 | 1.000 | 2 | 0.384 | 6 | 1.000 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 4 | 0.319 | 2 | 0.327 | 2 | 0.313 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 56 | 0.075 | 1 | 0.412 | 55 | 0.075 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 36 | 0.111 | – | – | 36 | 0.111 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 5 | 0.659 | 1 | 0.477 | 4 | 0.614 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 11 | 0.063 | 2 | 0.522 | 9 | 0.055 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 4 | 0.240 | 1 | 0.173 | 3 | 0.053 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 1 | 0.184 | 1 | 0.184 | – | – |
|
| ||||||
|
| 1 | 0.318 | – | – | 1 | 0.318 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 14 | 0.703 | 3 | 0.738 | 11 | 0.353 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 16 | 0.007 | 1 | 0.137 | 15 | 0.025 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 29 | 0.494 | – | – | 29 | 0.494 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 8 | 1.000 | – | – | 8 | 1.000 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 6 | 0.217 | – | – | 6 | 0.217 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 21 | 0.575 | 3 | 0.153 | 18 | 0.624 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 17 | 0.183 | 2 | 0.545 | 15 | 0.177 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 2 | 0.458 | – | – | 2 | 0.458 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 7 | 0.655 | – | – | 7 | 0.655 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 3 | 0.556 | 3 | 0.556 | – | – |
|
| ||||||
|
| 2 | 0.519 | – | – | 2 | 0.519 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 3 | 0.603 | – | – | 3 | 0.603 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 2 | 0.168 | – | – | 2 | 0.168 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 3 | 0.214 | 2 | 0.330 | 1 | 0.365 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 7 | 0.418 | 2 | 0.379 | 5 | 0.427 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 6 | 0.275 | – | – | 6 | 0.275 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 25 | 0.444 | 4 | 0.617 | 21 | 0.499 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 5 | 0.042 | – | – | 5 | 0.042 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 1 | 0.500 | – | – | 1 | 0.500 |
|
| ||||||
|
| |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNP | GENE/LOCUS | POSITION (hg19) | MINOR ALLELE | MAJOR ALLELE | CASE (HOM/HET/WILD) | CONTROL (HOM/HET/WILD) | MAF_CASE | MAF_CONTROL | P VALUE | OR (95%CI) | H-W P-VALUE (CONTROL) |
|
| |||||||||||
| rs1127215 |
| 1:117532790 | T | C | 119/578/1088 | 75/359/730 | 0.2286 | 0.2186 | 0.4124 | 1.052 (0.9316–1.188) | 0.001098 |
|
| |||||||||||
| rs703174 | / | 3:157493146 | T | C | 43/385/1381 | 26/251/904 | 0.1302 | 0.1283 | 0.6347 | 1.038 (0.8911–1.208) | 0.09052 |
|
| |||||||||||
| rs10937625 |
| 4:5128159 | C | T | 32/382/1427 | 28/266/885 | 0.1211 | 0.1366 | 0.135 | 0.8899 (0.7636–1.037) | 0.1383 |
|
| |||||||||||
| rs17590046 |
| 4:24362541 | C | T | 19/271/1566 | 10/168/1035 | 0.08324 | 0.07749 | 0.5715 | 1.056 (0.8751–1.274) | 0.3103 |
|
| |||||||||||
| rs10812774 |
| 9:28294231 | C | T | 376/736/610 | 225/505/384 | 0.4321 | 0.4286 | 0.9208 | 1.005 (0.9064–1.115) | 0.01435 |
|
| |||||||||||
| rs7033345 |
| 9:28717573 | G | T | 146/628/971 | 90/383/665 | 0.2636 | 0.2474 | 0.1812 | 1.084 (0.9631–1.22) | 0.00142 |
|
| |||||||||||
| rs12764057 |
| 10:68845715 | G | T | 357/804/565 | 256/503/348 | 0.4397 | 0.4584 | 0.1715 | 0.9293 (0.8366–1.032) | 0.005329 |
|
| |||||||||||
| rs10822974 |
| 10:68850419 | G | A | 372/774/597 | 232/511/400 | 0.4355 | 0.4265 | 0.5919 | 1.029 (0.9279–1.14) | 0.003701 |
|
| |||||||||||
| rs7903491 |
| 10:68917164 | T | G | 81/491/1220 | 59/367/757 | 0.1822 | 0.205 | 0.08022 | 0.8917 (0.7843–1.014) | 0.1078 |
|
| |||||||||||
| rs3794087 |
| 11:35329615 | T | G | 71/558/1221 | 51/361/784 | 0.1892 | 0.1936 | 0.9166 | 0.9931 (0.8716–1.131) | 0.2659 |
|
| |||||||||||
| rs9652490 |
| 15:77963887 | G | A | 197/736/867 | 125/502/541 | 0.3139 | 0.3219 | 0.5797 | 0.9691 (0.8672–1.083) | 0.5922 |
|
| |||||||||||
| rs11856808 |
| 15:77972770 | T | C | 0/28/1900 | 1/15/1232 | 0.007261 | 0.006811 | 0.7902 | 1.085 (0.5956–1.976) | 0.05337 |
|
| |||||||||||
| rs9980363 |
| 21:42520134 | C | T | 14/274/1565 | 8/184/1009 | 0.08149 | 0.08326 | 0.8135 | 0.9776 (0.8102–1.18) | 1 |
|
| |||||||||||
- —National Natural Science Foundation of China10.13039/501100001809
- —Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China10.13039/501100004735
- —Xiangya Hospital of Central South University10.13039/501100011790
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeurological disorders and treatments · Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments · Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Introduction
PD is a complex movement disorder in which genetics plays a remarkable role in its etiology [1]. With the emergence and popularity of sequencing technology, the genetic study of PD has achieved more rapid development and progress than ever before. Although our understanding of the genetic architecture of PD has expanded considerably, much remains to be done. Generally, genetic risk variants resulting in PD are often divided into two categories: rare variants with high effect sizes are more found in familial PD, the common variants with more minor effects are usually associated with apparently sporadic PD [23]. Additionally, genetic factors are important in both early-onset (EOPD, age at onset (AAO) ≦ 50 years) and late-onset (LOPD, AAO > 50 years) PD, but specific genes and mode of inheritance may differ between the two groups [4].
There has been a longstanding controversy surrounding the possible link between PD and another movement disorder, ET [567]. The two clinical entities have countless ties regarding their clinical, epidemiologic, imaging, pathologic, and genetic features [89101112]. Evidence from genetic research suggested that LINGO1, LINGO2, HS1BP3, DNAJC13, HTRA2, NAACP-Rep1, and CACNA1G were overlapping genetic risks between them [13]. A recent published genome-wide association study (GWAS) of ET revealed significant common variant overlap with PD [14]. Our previous study systematically investigated the association between rare coding variants in ET-associated genes and EOPD, and found the suggestive association between teneurin transmembrane protein 4 (TENM4) and EOPD, which provided evidence for a genetic link between ET and PD [15]. In the current research, we explored the potential genetic interplay between ET-associated genetic loci/genes and LOPD from mainland China.
Materials and Methods
Patients and controls
1962 sporadic late-onset (AAO > 50 years) PD patients (mean AAO, 61.88 ± 6.93 years; mean age, 66.76 ± 7.08 years; 50.15% male) and 1279 race-matched healthy controls (mean age, 62.32 ± 7.11 years; 47.93% male) were included in this case-control study (Supplementary Table 1). Patients were recruited from the outpatient neurology clinics of Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from October 2006 to January 2019 and other cooperating centers of Parkinson’s Disease & Movement Disorders Multicenter Database and Collaborative Network in China (PD-MDCNC, http://pd-mdcnc.com/). All the patients were subjected to the standard clinical evaluation by at least two neurologists and diagnosed with PD according to the criteria from UK PD Brain Bank [16] or Movement Disorders Society (MDS) [17]. Patients with a positive family history of PD and other neurological diseases were excluded. The clinical subtypes of PD were classified as tremor-dominant (TD), postural instability and gait difficulty-dominant (PIGD), and intermediate types based on the ratio of the mean tremor score of the unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale (UPDRS) to the mean PIGD score [18], of which 453 cases (23.1%) were classified as tremor-dominant. Controls collected from the community did not have any neurological or psychiatric system diseases. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects, as approved by the Ethical Committee of Xiangya Hospital of the Central South University in China (equivalent to an Institutional Review Board). After obtaining informed consent, blood samples were obtained from the subjects described above. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood using standard extraction methods.
Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and bioinformatics pipeline
According to the manufacturer’s instructions, genomic DNA samples of subjects were used for library construction and followed by sequencing with Illumina NovaSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Methods for the further bioinformatic pipeline were described previously [1920]. Raw data obtained became clean data through quality control by FastQC (version 0.11.2, Andrews.2010) and was then aligned to the human genome 19 reference by Burrows-Wheeler Alignment Maximal Exact Matches algorithm (BWA-MEM) (version 0.7.12-r1044, Li.2010). SNVs and InDels were called from aligned BAM files using the Genome Analysis Toolkit-GATK v2.3–9. Variants were further annotated with ANNOVAR [21] and VarCards [22] based on RefSeq (UCSC hg19). Exclusion criteria for individuals and variants was conducted through PLINK1.90. Individuals were removed for gender discrepancy, deviating heterozygosity/genotype calls (> 3 standard deviations [SDs]) and cryptic relatedness measured using identity-by-descent (IBD > 0.15). Genotypes with a Phred-scaled genotype quality score (GQ) below 15 (for SNVs) or 30 (for InDels), allele depth below two, or reads depth below five were removed in our analysis. Variants were filtered for missing genotype rate (< 0.1) and Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in controls (P > 0.0001) for the targeted regions. Principal component (PC) analysis on population stratification was performed in independent high-quality variants, and main PC variables for each sample were obtained for subsequent association analysis.
Rare Variant selection from targeted gene
A set of ET-associated genes/loci included in our analysis (Supplementary Table 2). [15]. The East Asian population evaluated the minor allele frequencies (MAF) from the public database (ExAC and gnomAD database) [23] to determine rare variants (MAF < 1%). The exon-coding rare variants extracted from the targeted gene were included in our analysis. Our study defined damaging missense variants based on variant prediction by ReVe (> 0.7) [24]. Loss-of-function (LoF) variants were annotated as stop-gain/loss, frameshift, or splicing variants.
Common variants selection from identified ET-GWAS study
ET genome-wide association study (ET-GWAS) has identified many putative ET loci, however, most of them had conflicting replication results. Five ET-GWAS papers were published and a total of 16 SNPs were found most significantly associated with ET until now (Table 1) [1425262728]. All of the 16 SNPs were included in our analysis. Specifically, four of the 16 variants were newly identified loci from a large European case-control study [14]. Variants were excluded for departure from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium among controls (P < 0.0001).
Statistical analyses
The aggregate burden of rare deleterious variants of ET-associated genes between LOPD and controls was calculated using the optimized sequence kernel association test (SKAT-O) [29]. Covariates including the gender, age, and first five principal components (PCs) of ancestry were used to adjust the analyses. We first performed SKAT-O analysis on the variants of complete ET gene sets and then on the variants for each gene. Individual logistic regression analyses (PLINK v1.90) were run for each of the selected ET-GWAS related SNPs, with PD status modeled as a function of SNP allele count (0,1, or 2), gender, age, and first five PCs of ancestry, and their corresponding odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Significant P values (< 0.05) generated were further adjusted following the Bonferroni procedure. The corresponding Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold of P was 0.0015 for gene-based burden tests and 0.0038 for single variant tests. The data were presented as mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables and counts for categorical variables.
To estimate statistical power of the burden of rare deleterious variants of ET-associated genes, we performed SKAT simulations for the included gene set or a single gene in our cohort [30]. Related parameters were set as follows: sample size (1962 vs. 1279), PD prevalence (0.0043), sum of gene-set coding region lengths (146kb), average gene-coding length (4.4kb), MAF cut-off for causal variants (0.03), and penetrance (100%). To estimate the statistical power for selected ET-GWAS-related SNPs, we used GAS power calculator to assess the statistical power of our cohort [31]. Related parameters were set for each SNP: sample size (1962 vs. 1279), PD prevalence (0.0043), significance level (0.05), disease allele frequency, and genotype relative risk.
Results
1962 sporadic LOPD patients and 1279 race-matched healthy controls were included in our case-control study and sequenced using WGS technology. The average sequencing depth of 12-fold and 95.5% of genome regions of at least a 5-fold coverage met our analysis. A standard bioinformatic pipeline was performed for detecting variants in the WGS sequencing data. The results of the SKAT simulations showed that our sample size could guarantee a statistical power of 100% for the gene set. We estimated an average power of nearly 47% to discover an association for single loci. Assessment of statistical power showed that our sample size could reach reliable power (>70%) for most of the selected SNPs (9/13). Four SNPs (rs1127215, rs10812774, rs7903491, and rs9980363) were insufficiently powered (32.8%~64.1%) mainly because of the relatively low value of genotype relative risk. The evaluation of statistical power indicated that our cohort was suitable for further analysis.
Further analysis for the selected set of ET-associated genes/loci, which included 33 genes and loci, identified 1453 variants in the exons and exon-intron boundaries with the minor allele frequencies (MAF) < 1% in our cohort. Logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age and sex, was used to test for association between genotype and PD. Based on our analysis strategy, variants of complete ET gene sets and the variants for each gene were analyzed by SKAT-O separately. However, there was no association between the ET gene set and the LOPD cohort within different combined categories (Table 2). In gene-based burden analysis of the ET single gene, we also observed no significant association between any gene and PD (Table 3).
Table 3: Analysis of ET associated genes rare (MAF < 0.01) damaging variant burden in cohort WGS.
For SNPs identified in previous ET-GWAS, three variants (rs28562175, rs1412229, and rs1945016) were excluded for further analysis because of deviated Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in our cohort. Nevertheless, no significant association was detected between the remaining 13 SNPs and LOPD (Table 4).
Discussion
The etiology of Parkinson’s disease remains unclear, with one of the consensuses that both environment and genetics contribute to its pathogenesis, especially for the most common late-onset sporadic form of PD. Accumulating evidence demonstrated genetic factors were involved in the pathogenesis of this disorder [323334]. Some research also suggested the possible genetic link between ET and PD [263536]. However, there was hardly a genomics-based large-scale study exploring this topic. In our recently published paper, we have systematically investigated the association between rare coding variants in ET-associated genes and EOPD using WES data and found a suggestive association between TENM4 and EOPD from mainland China [15]. However, EOPD represents only a small proportion of all PD cases. In the current research, we performed WGS in the 1962 sporadic LOPD cases and 1279 controls from mainland China and explored the potential genetic interplay between ET-associated genetic loci/variants and LOPD using logistic regression analysis and SKAT-O. As a result, we did not observe a significant association between the included SNPs with LOPD. Also, we did not discover a significant burden of rare deleterious variants tested of ET-associated gene in association with LOPD risk. Notably, most ET has a positive family history which indicates it is a familial disorder. A number of causative genes were reported in study of ET pedigrees. Function change of coding protein was considered to contribute to its pathogenesis [37]. However, significance of non-coding variants of these genes was unclear. Evaluation of non-coding variants contribution might be needed in our future study. Our results do not support the role of ET-associated genetic variants in LOPD.
Progress in genetic research has been made as to genetic loci and genes that confer susceptibility to ET in the past decade [3839]. Many putative ET loci have been reported; however, most have conflicting replication results. Meta-analyses revealed only a marginal association for STK32B rs10937625 and LINGO1 rs9652490 with ET [38]. Several variants have also been examined for their possible association with ET in the Chinese population. STK32B (rs10937625) and CTNNA3 (rs7903491) were associated with ET in China in two studies [4041]. Most association studies were reported negative results [424344454647]. Meantime, some studies focusing on the genetic association between ET and PD have also emerged. Although evidence indicates that ET and PD may share genetic risk factors [263536], some results did not support the link [484950]. Rare deleterious variants in ET-associated genes were seldom found in Mendelian inherited PD. As to the SNPs identified in ET-GWAS, similar results were obtained in a recent association study [51], which concluded that the 22 variants identified by the ET-GWAS study were not significantly associated with PD in European population.
Conflicting results from the association between ET and PD perhaps were related to the fact that currently, we have limited knowledge regarding the cause of these two disorders. Although a number of genes were reported as the potential causative genes in ET, the conflicting results and the lack of replication for many candidate genes may suggest the listed loci or genes here were not literally the ET-associated genetic factor. Although the present study does not support a role for genetic variants of ET in LOPD, further study is required to understand the potential link between PD and ET.
Limitations
This study has several limitations. First, estimated average statistical power for single-gene loci was only 47%. The rare variant number was mainly responsible for the poor power of the discovery of risk alleles at single loci. However, our sample size guaranteed a statistical power of 100% for the gene set, which may serve as a reliable supplement. Second, detailed information about tremor symptoms and the proportion of ET-converted PD were unavailable in our LOPD cohort, which prevented us from evaluating the underlying impact on the results. Moreover, some cases may not be PD along with a longer length of follow-up despite the fact that only 35 patients (~1.8%) who changed the diagnosis in our two-year follow up study were excluded from our cohort before initiating the analysis. However, we believe that the amount was very small and the impact was limited.
Additional Files
The additional files for this article can be found as follows:
10.5334/tohm.885.s1Supplementary Table 1.Summary of loci and genes associated with ET selected in our study. OR and p-values were presented for the SNPs identified in case-control studies or GWAS.
10.5334/tohm.885.s2Supplementary Table 2.Cohort clinical and demographic data.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Bloem BR, Okun MS, Klein C. Parkinson’s disease. Lancet (London, England). 2021; 397(10291): 2284–303. DOI: 10.1016/S 0140-6736(21)00218-X 33848468 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Blauwendraat C, Nalls MA, Singleton AB. The genetic architecture of Parkinson’s disease. The Lancet Neurology. 2020; 19(2): 170–8. DOI: 10.1016/S 1474-4422(19)30287-X 31521533 PMC 8972299 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Zhao Y, Qin L, Pan H, Liu Z, Jiang L, He Y, et al. The role of genetics in Parkinson’s disease: a large cohort study in Chinese mainland population. Brain: a journal of neurology. 2020; 143(7): 2220–34. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awaa 16732613234 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Jiang L, Pan HX, Zhao YW, Zeng Q, Liu ZH, Sun QY, et al. Contribution of coding/non-coding variants in NUS 1 to late-onset sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism & related disorders. 2021; 84: 29–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2021.01.01433548880 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Adler CH, Shill HA, Beach TG. Essential tremor and Parkinson’s disease: lack of a link. Movement disorders: official journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 2011; 26(3): 372–7. DOI: 10.1002/mds.2350921284040 PMC 3070808 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Thenganatt MA, Jankovic J. The relationship between essential tremor and Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism & related disorders. 2016; 22 Suppl 1: S 162–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.09.03226522219 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Algarni M, Fasano A. The overlap between Essential tremor and Parkinson disease. Parkinsonism & related disorders. 2018; 46 Suppl 1: S 101–S 4. DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.07.00628729090 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Dirkx MF, Zach H, Bloem BR, Hallett M, Helmich RC. The nature of postural tremor in Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2018; 90(13): e 1095–e 103. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.000000000000521529476038 PMC 5880634 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
