# Small Left Ventricular Size Is a Risk Factor for Recurrent Pericardial Effusion after Percutaneous Drainage

**Authors:** Kousuke Akao, Teruhiko Imamura, Koichiro Kinugawa

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/jcm13092644 · Journal of Clinical Medicine · 2024-04-30

## TL;DR

Small left ventricular size increases the risk of recurring pericardial effusion after drainage, according to a study of 39 patients.

## Contribution

This study identifies small left ventricular end-diastolic diameter as a novel independent risk factor for recurrent pericardial effusion.

## Key findings

- 11 out of 39 patients experienced recurrent pericardial effusion within 2 years.
- A left ventricular end-diastolic diameter cutoff of 42 mm predicted recurrence with 53% vs. 10% incidence.
- The adjusted hazard ratio for recurrence was 0.88 for each mm increase in left ventricular size.

## Abstract

Background: Significant pericardial effusion requires percutaneous drainage. Some patients experience recurrent pericardial effusion following index drainage, but its risk factors remain unknown. Such knowledge should further improve the clinical management of individuals presenting with pericardial effusion for risk stratification and the construction of therapeutic and management strategies beforehand. Methods: Patients who underwent percutaneous drainage for pericardial effusion between 2018 and 2023 were retrospectively included and were followed for 2 years or until November 2023. Baseline factors associated with recurrent pericardial effusion that required percutaneous drainage again were investigated to identify the high-risk cohort. Results: A total of 39 patients (83 years on median, 28 males) were included. During the 2-year observation period, 11 patients had the primary outcome. The left ventricular end-diastolic diameter at baseline was independently associated with the primary outcome with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.88 (95% confidence interval 0.80–0.97, p = 0.013) with a cutoff of 42 mm, which significantly stratified the cumulative incidence of the primary outcome (53% versus 10%, p = 0.011). Conclusions: Recurrent pericardial effusion after percutaneous drainage is not a rare phenomenon. A smaller left ventricular endo-diastolic diameter was an independent risk factor for recurrent pericardial effusion. The clinical implications of our findings in daily clinical practice should be validated in future prospective studies. Further studies are warranted to clarify the underlying causality between them.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** pericardial effusion (MONDO:0001370)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Ventricular (MESH:D014693), Pericardial Effusion (MESH:D010490)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11084400/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11084400/full.md

## References

16 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11084400/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11084400