31P-MRS, molecular level imaging for assessing muscular mitochondrial dysfunction in chronic kidney disease
Aurélie De Mul, Sandrine Lemoine

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMetabolism and Genetic Disorders · Neurological and metabolic disorders · Diet and metabolism studies
To the Editor,
We read with great interest the review titled ‘Making the invisible visible: imaging techniques for assessing muscle mass and muscle quality in chronic kidney disease’ by Alice Sabatino et al. [1] recently published in your journal. The review provides an insightful overview of the usefulness of imaging techniques to evaluate not only muscle quantity but also quality, particularly fat infiltration, in the context of chronic kidney disease (CKD) or end-stage kidney disease. The authors underline the importance of better understanding multifactorial muscle abnormalities, because they are predictive of worst outcomes. In this context, we would like to draw your attention to another functional imaging possibility: ^31^P magnetic resonance imaging spectroscopy (^31^P-MRS). ^31^P-MRS does not detect abundant proton signal like conventional resonance magnetic imaging. In contrast, signals from phosphorus-containing metabolites, such as phosphocreatine, inorganic phosphate and three different molecules of ATP—alpha, beta and gamma—are detected. This technique provides dynamic data on muscular oxidative metabolism and mitochondrial function by measuring intracellular phosphate and ATP variations in vivo, even during exercise and recovery. Mitochondrial function can be specifically evaluated by measuring phosphocreatine recovery time constant. Inflammation, oxidative stress, uremic toxin and myosteatosis can be associated with mitochondrial dysfunction in patients with CKD [2]. Limited data using ^31^P-MRS are available in the CKD population and would be beneficial to develop. Durozard et al. showed impaired muscular oxidative metabolism compensated by increased anaerobic glycolysis in dialyzed patients [3]. Comparing 21 controls subjects, 20 patients with CKD 3–5 and 22 patients on maintenance hemodialysis, Gamboa et al. demonstrated that muscular mitochondrial dysfunction was already present before initiation of dialysis [4]. Our group continuously monitored intracellular phosphate and ATP spectra during a 4-h hemodialysis session in 11 patients and revealed possible recurrent muscular ischemic injuries due to these metabolite depletions [5]. This exam should also be of greater interest to evaluate muscle metabolism in patients with CKD and tubulopathy with renal phosphate wasting.
Even if the technique availability may be limited by the requirement of a specific antenna and an experienced multidisciplinary team, this exam is non-invasive, not associated with radiation and does not require exogenous contrast. The leg can be scanned in isolation avoiding claustrophia and image acquisition time is reduced to <20 min. This technique can be combined with conventional magnetic resonance imaging. Due to its practicality, this exam can be easily performed and repeated, even in a patient undergoing dialysis [5] or exercising. It is particularly appealing for longitudinal monitoring or for recurrent assessment after a specific intervention such as an exercise program to see the impact of such initiatives on mitochondrial function. Therefore, ^31^P-MRS, an innovative imaging technique, may facilitate the translation of molecular-level oxidative metabolism abnormalities to a precise, in vivo evaluation of qualitative muscular dysfunction in CKD patient beyond low muscle mass.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Sabatino A, Sola KH, Brismar TB. et al. Making the invisible visible: imaging techniques for assessing muscle mass and muscle quality in chronic kidney disease. Clin Kidney J 2024;17:sfae 028. 10.1093/ckj/sfae 02838444750 PMC 10913944 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Ryan AS . Role of skeletal muscle mitochondrial dysfunction in CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2020;15:912. 10.2215/CJN.0805052032591420 PMC 7341784 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Durozard D, Pimmel P, Baretto S. et al. 31P NMR spectroscopy investigation of muscle metabolism in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 1993;43:885. 10.1038/ki.1993.1248479125 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Gamboa JL, Roshanravan B, Towse T. et al. Skeletal muscle mitochondrial dysfunction is present in patients with CKD before initiation of maintenance hemodialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2020;15:926. 10.2215/CJN.1032081932591419 PMC 7341789 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Chazot G, Lemoine S, Kocevar G. et al. Intracellular phosphate and ATP depletion measured by magnetic resonance spectroscopy in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2021;32:229. 10.1681/ASN.202005071633093193 PMC 7894675 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
