ASO Author Reflections: Changes in the Urinary Microbiome After Transurethral Resection of Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Insights from a Prospective Observational Study
Aleksander Ślusarczyk

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments · Urinary Tract Infections Management · Pelvic floor disorders treatments
Past
The role of the urinary microbiome in developing and course of bladder cancer remains a matter of debate. Previous investigations had primarily focused on comparing urine microbiome composition between patients with and without evidence of tumor, overlooking the specific alterations induced by the transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT).^1^ Additionally, the unexplored territory of the tumor-associated microbiome remains understudied and its comparison to the microbiome detected in urine requires further studies, also regarding the urine method collection.^2,3^ Our study addressed the changes in the urinary microbiome after transurethral resection of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and the characteristics of tumor tissue microbiome.^4^
Present
Our findings revealed dynamic shifts in the bladder microbiome of low-grade Ta papillary NMIBC patients following TURBT. Notably, the phylogenetic diversity of the urine microbiome decreased at the 1-year follow-up, with distinct taxa enrichment compared with the time of index resection. Actinomyces, Candidatus, Sphingobacterium, Sellimonas, Fusobacterium, and Roseobacter were identified as the most differentially enriched taxa in the urine at follow-up. Furthermore, the tumor tissue microbiome displayed greater phylogenetic diversity than paired urine samples with enrichment of Acinetobacter and Sphingomonas taxa. Moreover, specific bacterial taxa are enriched in patients who will develop recurrence, namely Corynebacterium and Anaerococcus could serve as potential prognostic factors for future recurrence.
Future
The implications of our study underscore the need for further research to unravel the interplay between bladder microbiome, tumor microbiome, and their alterations. Elucidating the predictive value of these microbiome changes could pave the way for personalized therapeutic interventions. Future studies should delve into the development of probiotic drugs, offering a targeted approach to modulate microbial communities and enhance antitumor immunity. A comprehensive understanding of the urinary microbiome's intricate relationship with disease recurrence and progression holds promise for more effective and personalized therapeutic strategies in the management of NMIBC.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Hussein AA Bhat TA Jing Z Gomez EC Wasay MA Singh PK Does the urinary microbiome profile change after treatment of bladder cancer?World J Urol 202341123593359810.1007/s 00345-023-04627-137796319 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Mansour B MonyókÁMakra N Gajdács M Vadnay I Ligeti B Bladder cancer-related microbiota: examining differences in urine and tissue samples Sci Rep 20201011104210.1038/s 41598-020-67443-232632181 PMC 7338485 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Pederzoli F Ferrarese R Amato V Locatelli I Alchera E LucianòR Sex-specific alterations in the urinary and tissue microbiome in therapy-naïve urothelial bladder cancer patients Eur Urol Oncol 20203678478810.1016/j.euo.2020.04.00232345542 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Ślusarczyk A Ismail H ZapałaŁPiecha T Zapała P Radziszewski P Changes in the urinary microbiome after transurethral resection of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: insights from a prospective observational study Ann Surg Oncol 202410.1245/s 10434-024-15198-938570378 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
