Say ‘no’ to carcinogen as contraception alternative
Karen Malec
TL;DR
The paper responds to a study suggesting contraception increases urinary tract infection risk, arguing against using carcinogens as an alternative.
Contribution
It critiques the use of carcinogens as a safer contraception alternative, emphasizing potential health risks.
Findings
The paper challenges the safety of using carcinogens for contraception.
It highlights the health risks associated with carcinogen exposure.
The authors advocate for safer contraceptive methods.
Abstract
A response to Correspondence to ‘Dienye PO, Gbeneol PK. Contraception as a risk factor for urinary tract infection in Port Harcourt, Nigeria: A case control study. Afr J Prm Health Care Fam Med. 2011;3(1), Art. #207, 4 pages. doi:10.4102/phcfm.v3i1.207
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsReproductive Health and Contraception · Global Maternal and Child Health · Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health