Validity and reliability of anxiety literacy (A-Lit) and its relationship with demographic variables in the Iranian general population
Alireza Jafari, Mahdi Moshki, Ali Mohammad Mokhtari, Fatemehzahra Naddafi, Mahbobeh Nejatian

TL;DR
This study evaluated how well a tool for measuring anxiety knowledge works in Iran and found that most people have low anxiety literacy, suggesting a need for public education.
Contribution
The study validated and adapted the A-Lit tool for the Iranian population and identified demographic factors influencing anxiety literacy.
Findings
The Persian version of A-Lit with 19 items was confirmed as valid and reliable.
Only 18.6% of participants answered 13 or more questions correctly, indicating low anxiety literacy.
Demographic factors like sex, age, occupation, and information sources significantly correlate with A-Lit levels.
Abstract
Anxiety disorder is one of the most common mental disorders. This cross-sectional research aimed to determine anxiety literacy (A-Lit) psychometric properties among the Iranian population in 2022. This research was conducted on 690 people in Iran in 2022. In this study, people were selected by proportional stratified sampling, and the validity and reliability of the A-Lit designed by Griffiths were assessed. Validity of A-Lit was assessed by face validity, content validity, and confirmatory factor analysis. Reliability of A-Lit was evaluated by the McDonald’s omega coefficient, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, and test– retest. In analytical sections, the tests of One-way ANOVA, Chi-squared test, and independent samples t-test were used. The rates of S-CVI/Ave and CVR for A-Lit were 0.922 and 0.774, respectively. In confirmatory factor analysis, three items were deleted because the…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAfrican Studies and Geopolitics · International Relations and Autism · Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
