# Formalising prestige bias: Differences between models with first-order and second-order cues

## TL;DR

This paper explores how prestige bias influences cultural evolution by comparing models based on first-order and second-order cues.

## Contribution

The study introduces a computational model to differentiate prestige bias based on first-order and second-order cues.

## Key findings

- Distinguishing between first-order and second-order cues is crucial for understanding cultural evolution.
- The two types of prestige bias formalisation can lead to different cultural evolutionary outcomes.

## Abstract

Knowledge and behaviour are transmitted from one individual to another through social learning and eventually disseminated across the population. People often learn useful behaviours socially through selective bias rather than random selection of targets. Prestige bias, or the tendency to selectively imitate prestigious individuals, has been considered an important factor in influencing human behaviour. Although its importance in human society and culture has been recognised, the formulation of prestige bias is less developed than that of other social learning biases. To examine the effects of prestige bias on cultural evolution theoretically, it is imperative to formulate prestige and investigate its basic properties. We reviewed two definitions: one based on first-order cues, such as the demonstrator's appearance and job title, and the other based on second-order cues, such as people's behaviour towards the demonstrator (e.g. people increasingly pay attention to prestigious individuals). This study builds a computational model of prestige bias based on these two definitions and compares the cultural evolutionary dynamics they generate. Our models demonstrate the importance of distinguishing between the two types of formalisation, because they can have different influences on cultural evolution.