Assessing Concordance of Results: A Comparative Study of the Manual and Automated Urinalysis Methods
Nicholas Kwame Afriyie Gyamfi, George Nkrumah Osei, Ruth C. Brenyah, Lawrence Duah Agyemang, Paulina Ampomah, Kwame Osei Darkwah, Emmanuel Toboh, Richard K D Ephraim

TL;DR
This study compares manual and automated urinalysis methods in Ghana, finding strong agreement in most parameters but highlighting the need for manual checks for certain elements like bacteria.
Contribution
The study provides a detailed comparison of automated and manual urinalysis methods in a Ghanaian hospital setting, focusing on concordance and correlation.
Findings
Strong correlation was found for red blood cell, white blood cell, and epithelial cell counts.
Manual microscopy is still needed for classifying urine sediments like bacteria and yeast-like cells.
Automated and manual methods showed similar performance for physical and chemical examination parameters.
Abstract
An accurate urine analysis is a good indicator of the status of the renal and genitourinary system. However, limited studies have been done on comparing the diagnostic performance of the fully automated analyser and manual urinalysis especially in Ghana. This study evaluated the concordance of results of the fully automated urine analyser (Sysmex UN series) and the manual method urinalysis at the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital in Kumasi, Ghana. Methodology. Sixty-seven (67) freshly voided urine samples were analysed by the automated urine analyser Sysmex UN series and by manual examination at Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Ghana. Kappa and Bland-Altman plot analyses were used to evaluate the degree of concordance and correlation of both methods, respectively. Substantial (κ = 0.711, p < 0.01), slight (κ = 0.193, p = 0.004), and slight (κ = 0.109, p < 0.001) agreements were found for…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEconomic and Environmental Valuation · Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection · Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
