Postural Change of the Annual Cicada (Tibicen linnei) Helps Facilitate Backward Flight

TL;DR

Cicadas use backward flight for better maneuverability, and their body posture helps control aerodynamic forces, which could inspire micro-aerial vehicle designs.

Contribution

This study is the first to show that cicadas use backward flight, revealing how body posture affects aerodynamic forces and flight mechanics.

Findings

Backward flight involves steep body angles and high wing velocities, with aerodynamic forces aligned similarly to forward flight.

The upstroke becomes aerodynamically active in backward flight, contributing 50% of net forces due to leading-edge vortices and high velocity.

Backward flight reorients stroke planes and aerodynamic forces in the global frame, reversing the function of wing half-strokes.

Abstract

Cicadas are heavy fliers well known for their life cycles and sound production; however, their flight capabilities have not been extensively investigated. Here, we show for the first time that cicadas appropriate backward flight for additional maneuverability. We studied this flight mode using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations based on three-dimensional reconstructions of high-speed videos captured in a laboratory. Backward flight was characterized by steep body angles, high angles of attack, and high wing upstroke velocities. Wing motion occurred in an inclined stroke plane that was fixed relative to the body. Likewise, the directions of the half-stroke-averaged aerodynamic forces relative to the body (local frame) were constrained in a narrow range (<20°). Despite the drastic difference of approximately 90° in body posture between backward and forward flight in the global frame, the aerodynamic forces in both flight scenarios were maintained in a similar direction relative to the body. The forces relative to the body were also oriented in a similar direction when observed during climbs and turns, although the body orientation and motions were different. Hence, the steep posture appropriated during backward flight was primarily utilized for reorienting both the stroke plane and aerodynamic force in the global frame. A consequence of this reorientation was the reversal of aerodynamic functions of the half strokes in backward flight when compared to forward flight. The downstroke generated propulsive forces, while the upstroke generated vertical forces. For weight support, the upstroke, which typically generates lesser forces in forward flight, is aerodynamically active in backward flight. A leading-edge vortex (LEV) was observed on the forewings during both half strokes. The LEV’s effect, together with the high upstroke velocity, increased the upstroke’s force contribution from 10% of the net forces in forward flight to 50% in backward flight. The findings presented in this study have relevance to the design of micro-aerial vehicles (MAVs), as backward flight is an important characteristic for MAV maneuverability or for taking off from vertical surfaces.

Figures