Diagnostic performance of contrast‐enhanced mammography for suspicious findings in dense breasts: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Shu‐ting Lin, Hong‐jiang Li, Yi‐zhong Li, Qian‐qian Chen, Jia‐yi Ye, Shu Lin, Si‐qing Cai, Jian‐guo Sun

TL;DR
Contrast-enhanced mammography shows high accuracy in detecting suspicious lesions in dense breasts, with enhanced and irregular-margin lesions often being malignant.
Contribution
This study provides a meta-analysis of CEM's diagnostic performance for dense breasts, revealing strong sensitivity and malignancy correlations.
Findings
CEM has a summary sensitivity of 0.95 and specificity of 0.81 for detecting suspicious lesions in dense breasts.
Enhanced lesions and irregular margins are strongly associated with malignancy.
The malignancy odds ratio for enhanced lesions is 28.11, and for circumscribed margins is 0.17.
Abstract
Contrast‐enhanced spectral imaging (CEM) is a new mammography technique, but its diagnostic value in dense breasts is still inconclusive. We did a systematic review and meta‐analysis of studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of CEM for suspicious findings in dense breasts. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched systematically until August 6, 2023. Prospective and retrospective studies were included to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CEM for suspicious findings in dense breasts. The QUADAS‐2 tool was used to evaluate the quality and risk of bias of the included studies. STATA V.16.0 and Review Manager V.5.3 were used to meta‐analyze the included studies. A total of 10 studies (827 patients, 958 lesions) were included. These 10 studies reported the diagnostic performance of CEM for the workup of suspicious lesions in patients with dense breasts.…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBotany and Plant Ecology Studies
