Clinical Outcomes With Once‐Weekly Insulin Icodec Versus Once‐Daily Insulin Glargine U100 in Insulin‐Naïve and Previously Insulin‐Treated Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta‐Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
Mushood Ahmed, Aimen Shafiq, Hira Javaid, Hritvik Jain, Abdulqadir J. Nashwan, Qura Tul‐Ain, Jawad Basit

TL;DR
A weekly insulin called icodec was found to be as safe as daily insulin glargine and better at controlling blood sugar in people with type 2 diabetes.
Contribution
This is the first meta-analysis comparing once-weekly insulin icodec with once-daily glargine U100 in type 2 diabetes patients.
Findings
Insulin icodec improved time in target blood sugar range compared to glargine U100.
icodec reduced HbA1c levels more effectively than glargine U100.
Both insulins had similar safety profiles, including hypoglycaemia and adverse events.
Abstract
The once‐weekly insulin icodec, a new basal insulin analog, may positively support a reduction in injection frequency and improve adherence to therapy in type 2 diabetes (T2D). This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of insulin icodec compared with those of once‐daily glargine U100. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library from inception till September 2023. Data about clinical outcomes in both groups were extracted. Forest plots were generated using the random‐effects model by pooling odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs). Five randomised controlled trials and 2019 individuals with T2DM were included. In the pooled analysis, time in range was significantly higher (MD = 4.35; 95% CI: 1.65 to 7.05; p = 0.002) in the icodec group than in the once‐daily glargine group. The HbA1c levels were significantly…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvertising and Communication Studies
