Effect of Metronidazole on Concentrations of Vaginal Bacteria Associated with Risk of HIV Acquisition
D.J. Valint, Tina L. Fiedler, Congzhou Liu, Sujatha Srinivasan, David N. Fredricks

TL;DR
Metronidazole reduces harmful vaginal bacteria linked to higher HIV risk, but some bacteria take longer to eliminate.
Contribution
This study quantifies metronidazole's effect on 13 BV-associated bacterial taxa and identifies variable clearance times.
Findings
Metronidazole reduced bacterial DNA concentrations by 2.3–4.5 log10-fold across all taxa.
Some bacteria like Gemella asaccharolytica required over 7 days for suppression.
Bacterial concentrations often dropped below qPCR detection limits, suggesting eradication.
Abstract
Several bacterial vaginosis (BV)-associated bacteria have been associated with elevated risk of HIV acquisition, however susceptibility of these bacteria to antibiotics is poorly understood. Vaginal samples were collected from 22 persons daily for two weeks following BV diagnosis. Metronidazole treatment was prescribed for 5–7 days. Changes in bacterial concentrations were measured with taxon-specific 16S rRNA gene quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays. A culture-based antimicrobial assay confirmed presence of antibiotics in vaginal swab samples. Bacterial DNA concentrations decreased during antibiotic administration for all thirteen bacterial taxa tested. Comparison of bacterial DNA concentrations in samples before administration of antibiotics to samples taken on the last day of antimicrobial assay-confirmed antibiotic presence showed a 2.3–4.5 log10-fold decrease across all taxa.…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsReproductive tract infections research · Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment · Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Background
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a gynecologic condition characterized by a shift in the vaginal microbiota in which the healthy Lactobacillus-dominated community is replaced by a complex and heterogeneous consortium of anaerobic bacteria [Fredricks 2005, Srinivasan 2010, Srinivasan 2012, Ravel 2013]. This shift in the microbial community is associated with several adverse sequelae, including an increased risk of sexually transmitted infections such as with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) [Martin 1999, Cohen 2012]. A broad array of vaginal bacterial species has been associated with elevated risk of subsequent HIV acquisition, including Prevotella spp., Sneathia spp., Parvimonas spp., Gemella asaccharolytica, Mycoplasma hominis, Porphyromonas species Type 1, Eggerthella-like vaginal bacterial species Type 1, Megasphaera spp., Amygdalobacter indicium (previously BV-associated bacterium 2 [Srinivasan 2023]), Peptoniphilus lacrimalis and Vaginal TM7 [McClelland 2018, Gosmann 2017, Srinivasan 2018, 2019]. Bacterial associations with HIV risk may be due to increased genital inflammation caused by bacteria [McClelland 2018, Srinivasan 2018, Srinivasan 2019, Anahtar 2015], disruption of the cervicovaginal mucus layer by bacterial sialidases and mucinases [McGregor 1994, Cauci 2011], or other factors. Regardless, identifying an effective intervention that can target these bacteria would allow for the assessment of the direct impact of bacteria on HIV acquisition and would provide a critical step towards devising additional preventive measures to mitigate HIV infection risk if bacteria play a causal role.
Current CDC guidelines recommend metronidazole as first-line treatment for BV, though clindamycin, secnidazole, and tinidazole may also be used [Weir 2023, Workowski 2021]. Metronidazole is often the preferred option due to its efficacy and low cost [Schwebke 2007, Schmitt 1992, Sobel 1997] and administered as a topically applied vaginal gel or orally ingested pills. Metronidazole is an antibiotic prodrug activated via reduction under anaerobic conditions and targets many anaerobic bacteria present in BV. Metronidazole treatment can have a dramatic effect on the vaginal bacterial community, resulting in a widespread reduction in bacterial concentrations across the diverse community of BV-associated bacteria [Fredricks 2009]. For some vaginal bacterial taxa such as Gardnerella spp. and Fannyhessea vaginae, metronidazole was effective in reducing the concentrations but not eradicating these bacteria [Bradshaw 2006, Mayer 2015].
For many of the HIV risk-associated vaginal bacterial species, susceptibility to antibiotics is poorly documented. Many of these organisms are fastidious making direct measurements of in vitro antibiotic susceptibility difficult. Moreover, there is a paucity of in vivo, longitudinal studies of the vaginal microbiota that utilize quantitative PCR techniques to assess absolute changes in concentrations of vaginal bacterial species with antibiotic therapy. Based on an NCBI PubMed search with the search terms “(vaginal) AND ((microbiome) OR (microbiota)) AND (metronidazole) AND ((quantitative PCR) OR (qPCR))”, as of October 2023, only seven studies reported longitudinal, in vivo qPCR data describing the shifts in vaginal bacterial concentrations over the course of metronidazole treatment [Armstrong 2022(a), Armstrong 2022(b), van de Wijgert 2020, Balkus 2017, Ahrens 2020, Srinivasan 2010, Mayer 2015]. Of these, only four included data on the concentrations of at least one bacterial taxon associated with HIV-risk [Armstrong 2022(a), Balkus 2017, Srinivasan 2010, Mayer 2015], and only two collected daily vaginal samples subjected to qPCR [Srinivasan 2010, Mayer 2015]. While the findings of Srinivasan et al. (2010) and Mayer et al. (2015) help to elucidate the dynamic behavior of the vaginal bacterial community during and following antibiotic treatment for BV, both studies included a relatively small number of participants with BV and neither study specifically sought to clarify how HIV-risk-associated bacterial taxa respond to metronidazole treatment.
To fill this knowledge gap, we leveraged data from a longitudinal study of persons with BV treated with metronidazole to determine how concentrations of vaginal bacteria change in vivo in response to antibiotic therapy, circumventing the need for laboratory cultivation to assess susceptibility. We targeted 13 vaginal bacterial species previously linked to elevated HIV infection risk and measured concentrations of bacterial DNA by qPCR in a longitudinal sample set of vaginal swabs collected daily for a two-week period following BV diagnosis, capturing the entire duration of treatment and approximately one week following cessation. Our immediate goal was to determine whether metronidazole leads to eradication of high-risk vaginal bacteria, with an ultimate goal of identifying an intervention that could be studied to deplete these bacteria and assess impact on HIV infection risk.
Methods
Study Population, Treatment and Sampling
Between October 2012 and June 2016, persons with BV were enrolled in a study of the vaginal microbiota conducted by the University of Washington and the Fred Hutch Cancer Center in Seattle, WA. Protocols were approved by the Fred Hutch Institutional Review Board (IRB Protocol #7683) and all study participants provided written informed consent. For each participant with BV, antibiotic treatment with metronidazole was prescribed either as 5 g of vaginally applied gel (with 37.5 mg of metronidazole) daily for 5 days, or orally ingested pills of 500 mg twice daily for 7 days. BV was diagnosed using Amsel clinical criteria [Amsel 1983]. Daily vaginal swabs encompassing a 15-day window beginning immediately prior to antimicrobial assay-confirmed initiation of antibiotic treatment were collected spanning 32 individual antibiotic treatment courses from 22 different persons with BV. Nugent scores based on vaginal fluid Gram stain [Nugent 1991] prior to antibiotic treatment were calculated using the baseline vaginal samples to also assess for BV.
Confirmation of Antibiotic Use
To evaluate adherence to antibiotics, an antimicrobial test was developed to confirm the presence of antibiotics in vaginal swab samples. This assay used vaginal fluid inoculated onto plates with cultured bacteria susceptible to metronidazole. Vaginal swabs were washed by vortex mixing in cold, filtered saline (4°C, Millipore Amicon^®^ Ultra-15 100kDa MWCO Centrifugal Filter) for 2 minutes. Resulting fluid was then centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C to separate pellet. Supernatant was removed and added into holes punctured in agar plates prepared with a lawn of bacteria. 50 μL of supernatant was inoculated onto plates prepared with Prevotella amnii, and 100 μL of supernatant was inoculated onto plates prepared with Megasphaera hutchinsoni. Presence of antibiotics in the supernatant was indicated by the development of a ring of clearance in the bacterial lawn around the punctured holes in the agar after incubation for 22–24 hours at 37^o^C under anaerobic conditions.
Samples from a treatment course were only included for further analysis if antibiotic presence was observed in at least 80% of samples (a minimum of 4 out of 5 days) if prescribed vaginal metronidazole gel, or 6 out of 7 days if prescribed oral metronidazole starting from the first day of observed presence of antibiotics.
Measurement of Concentrations of Individual Bacterial Taxa
DNA was extracted from vaginal swabs using QIAamp BiOstic Bacteremia DNA Isolation kit and subjected to taxon-specific 16S rRNA gene qPCR assays to monitor changes in concentrations of thirteen bacterial taxa, each of which has been shown to be associated with elevated HIV infection risk [McClelland 2018, Srinivasan 2018, Srinivasan 2019]. Previously published assays were employed targeting the 16S rRNA gene for Amygdalobacter indicium (BVAB2), Megasphaera lornae, Sneathia spp. [Fredricks 2009], *Eggerthella-*like sp., Prevotella amnii [Srinivasan 2015], Gemella asaccharolytica, Mycoplasma hominis, Parvimonas sp. Type 1, Parvimonas sp. Type 2, Porphyromonas sp. Type 1 [McClelland 2018], Vaginal TM7 [Haggerty 2020], and Megasphaera hutchinsoni [Sabo 2023]. A qPCR assay targeting the 16S rRNA gene for Peptoniphilus lacrimalis was also developed for this study; the primer/probe sequences and assay reaction conditions are presented in Tables S1 & S2. To test for the presence of PCR inhibitors, an internal amplification control (IAC) PCR assay using jellyfish DNA was conducted on all samples [Khot 2008]. No-template negative controls were included for each qPCR assay.
Definition of Suppression
For each bacterial taxon, if the concentration of bacterial DNA reached the lower limit of detection for the qPCR assay during the 15-day sampling window, that taxon was defined as “suppressed” for that treatment course. Lower limits of detection ranged from 62.5–187.5 16S rRNA gene copies/swab, varying between taxa on the basis of assay sensitivity. The number of “days until suppression” was counted starting from the baseline day (1 day prior to confirmed antibiotic presence) until the first day for which qPCR data qualified a taxa/treatment course as “suppressed”.
Data Analysis
To assess significance of observed decreases in concentrations of bacterial DNA from baseline, Student t-tests were conducted for each taxon, using the Holm-Šídák method. Correlation between baseline concentrations of bacterial DNA and time required to suppression was evaluated by linear regression. Observed differences in time to suppression between orally administered vs. topically applied metronidazole gel were assessed for statistical significance by Mann-Whitney U-test. All statistical analyses and data visualization were performed using GraphPad Prism 8.0.
Results
Thirty-two treatment courses were documented in 22 persons with BV. The mean age of all participants was 31.71 years (SD 6.21). Fifty-five percent of participants self-identified as White, and 41% as Black. All participants self-identified as non-Hispanic. Oral metronidazole was prescribed for 17 total treatment courses, while vaginal metronidazole gel was prescribed for 15. The median Nugent score prior to antibiotic treatment was 8, and scores ranged from 4–10 (Table 1), with clinical diagnosis of BV made by Amsel criteria.
The IAC assay did not detect PCR inhibition in any of the samples, allowing for confidence in the accuracy of subsequent qPCR results. No-template PCR controls were reproducibly negative highlighting the lack of cross-well contamination during qPCR.
Mean vaginal bacterial DNA concentrations decreased over the duration of antibiotic administration for all bacterial taxa tested, as reflected by taxon-specific qPCR assays and by documenting use of antibiotics in vaginal fluid by antimicrobial assay (Fig. 1, 2, 3).
Comparison of bacterial DNA concentrations from samples taken before administration of antibiotics to samples taken on the last day of assay-confirmed antibiotic presence showed multiple log10-fold decreases in bacterial DNA across all thirteen taxa. The smallest decrease in bacterial DNA concentration was observed for Mycoplasma hominis which only decreased by 2.2 log on average. In the other extreme, we observed an average decrease in Prevotella amnii bacterial DNA concentration of 4.5 logs (Fig. 2, 3).
In most cases, bacterial DNA concentrations were reduced to the assay’s limit of detection, suggesting bacterial eradication, though we cannot exclude continued presence of these bacteria at concentrations below our detection threshold. Suppression was noted in all thirteen bacterial taxa monitored, with frequency of suppression varying from 56.5% (Sneathia spp., suppression reached in only 13 of 23 treatment courses) to 100% (Vaginal TM7, suppression reached in 5 of 5 treatment courses) (Table 2).
Mean time to suppression varied between taxa. Parvimonas Type 1 was one of the most rapidly suppressed taxa, requiring on average only 1.2 days to reach suppression, while vaginal TM7 required the longest time to suppress (average of 8.6 days). Four taxa (Gemella asaccharolytica, Eggerthella-like sp., Sneathia spp., and Vaginal TM7) required on average greater than 7 days to reach suppression (Fig. 4A). Higher baseline bacterial load was correlated with longer time until suppression (p<0.0001), though the strength of the correlation was low (r^2^=0.21) (Fig. 4B).
No significant differences were observed in time to suppression between orally administered vs. topically applied metronidazole for any of the thirteen assayed taxa (Fig. 5).
Discussion
In this study, we demonstrate that the administration of metronidazole for treatment of BV reduced concentrations of 13 vaginal bacterial taxa previously associated with increased risk of HIV acquisition as measured by taxon-specific qPCR assays. While all thirteen taxa were found to decrease in concentration over the period of treatment, the magnitude of response of each taxon varied. Parvimonas Type 1 and M. hutchinsoni were most rapidly depleted, reaching the threshold for suppression in an average of <4 days. In contrast, G. asaccharolytica, Eggerthella-like sp., Sneathia spp., and Vaginal TM7 were observed to persist for a longer duration, detected above the threshold for suppression for >7 days on average.
Our findings suggest that while metronidazole is effective in reducing the concentrations of bacterial taxa linked to increased risk of HIV acquisition, a 5–7-day treatment course of metronidazole may not be sufficient to fully suppress all taxa, including Gemella asaccharolytica, Eggerthella-like sp., Sneathia spp., and Vaginal TM7. This 5–7-day antibiotic duration has been found effective in treating acute BV. However, the likelihood of recurrence of BV after treatment is high, with observed recurrence rates of up to 80% [Bradshaw 2006, Bradshaw 2016, Vodstrcil 2021]. The exact cause of recurrent BV is not fully understood, and is likely multifactorial, but one potential factor may be the failure of a standard treatment course of metronidazole to completely eradicate all pathogenic bacterial taxa. The results of this study support that hypothesis and indicate that for several vaginal bacterial taxa associated with BV and HIV-acquisition, the standard of care treatment is insufficient for suppression of bacteria to levels undetectable by qPCR. As such, a longer duration of treatment or more bactericidal antibiotics may be required in order to eradicate some vaginal bacteria. Continuation of antibiotic treatment beyond the standard of care has not been observed to be effective at reducing BV recurrence [Schwebke 2007] though initial investigations of high dose vaginal metronidazole therapy have shown encouraging results [Aguin 2014, Sobel 2019].
Metronidazole was observed to be equally effective in suppressing bacterial concentrations when administered orally or as a vaginally applied gel. In a 2009 study, Mitchell et al. compared oral and vaginal metronidazole for the treatment of BV in pregnancy and reported comparable changes in concentrations of most bacterial taxa as evaluated by qPCR [Mitchell 2009]. Notably, Sneathia spp. showed greater response to oral treatment, however, we did not note this difference in the present study. This discrepancy may be explained by the low number of individuals with presence of Sneathia spp. in our study (vaginal n=7).
This study reflects a dense longitudinal analysis of the vaginal microbiota during antibiotic therapy using quantitative PCR to illustrate how several vaginal bacterial taxa associated with increased HIV infection risk respond to metronidazole treatment. The high degree of sensitivity, specificity, and dynamic range for the qPCR assays allow for a high degree of confidence when declaring a bacterial taxon to have been suppressed in a given treatment course. Additionally, the longitudinal nature of the sample set allowed for the capture of data points before, during and following the antibiotic treatment window.
Another strength of this study is the ability to accurately assess antibiotic adherence compared to self-report. An objective test to measure antibiotic presence in a sample allowed us to confirm a participant’s adherence to antibiotic treatment and therefore increase confidence in our conclusions. Additionally, for this study we measured antibiotic response in vivo, reflecting biologically relevant concentrations of antibiotic and not requiring in vitro cultivation.
A limitation of our study is the modestly sized study population; however, we had sufficient power to demonstrate successful eradication of most bacteria. The longitudinal sample set used in this study was limited to 15 days following the onset of treatment for BV, thus we did not capture the long-term dynamics of the bacterial communities following metronidazole therapy. Furthermore, our definition of suppression does not address the issue of recurrence – it only addresses the capacity for and rate at which metronidazole therapy reduces the concentrations of bacterial taxa to the limits of detection by each respective assay. In terms of the study population, this cohort was comprised of a roughly even split of White and Black persons with a history of BV, located in the Seattle, WA area. As such, the results of this study may not be generalizable to other populations. qPCR measures bacterial DNA concentrations, and the presence of bacterial DNA may not reflect viable bacteria, though the absence of bacterial DNA does imply that concentrations of bacterial cells are low or absent.
We conclude that metronidazole therapy was effective at decreasing vaginal concentrations of thirteen bacterial taxa associated with increased risk of HIV-acquisition, although the time required for suppression often exceeded 7 days for several taxa. Eradication of high-risk vaginal bacteria using metronidazole is one promising avenue to explore for reducing risk for HIV acquisition.
Supplementary Material
1
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Ahrens P, Andersen LO, Lilje B, Johannesen TB, Dahl EG, Baig S, Jensen JS, Falk L. Changes in the vaginal microbiota following antibiotic treatment for Mycoplasma genitalium, Chlamydia trachomatis and bacterial vaginosis. P Lo S One. 2020 Jul 28;15(7):e 0236036. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236036.32722712 PMC 7386580 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Aguin T, Akins RA, Sobel JD. High-dose vaginal maintenance metronidazole for recurrent bacterial vaginosis: a pilot study. Sex Transm Dis. 2014 May;41(5):290–1. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000123.24722380 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Amsel R, Totten PA, Spiegel CA, Chen KC, Eschenbach D, Holmes KK. Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am J Med. 1983 Jan;74(1):14–22. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(83)91112-9.6600371 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Anahtar MN, Byrne EH, Doherty KE, Bowman BA, Yamamoto HS, Soumillon M, Padavattan N, Ismail N, Moodley A, Sabatini ME, Ghebremichael MS, Nusbaum C, Huttenhower C, Virgin HW, Ndung’u T, Dong KL, Walker BD, Fichorova RN, Kwon DS. Cervicovaginal bacteria are a major modulator of host inflammatory responses in the female genital tract. Immunity. 2015 May 19;42(5):965–76. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.04.019.25992865 PMC 4461369 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Armstrong E, Hemmerling A, Miller S, Burke KE, Newmann SJ, Morris SR, Reno H, Huibner S, Kulikova M, Liu R, Crawford ED, Castañeda GR, Nagelkerke N, Coburn B, Cohen CR, Kaul R. Metronidazole treatment rapidly reduces genital inflammation through effects on bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria rather than lactobacilli. J Clin Invest. 2022 Mar 15;132(6):e 152930. doi: 10.1172/JCI 152930.35113809 PMC 8920324 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Armstrong E, Hemmerling A, Miller S, Burke KE, Newmann SJ, Morris SR, Reno H, Huibner S, Kulikova M, Nagelkerke N, Coburn B, Cohen CR, Kaul R. Sustained effect of LACTIN-V (Lactobacillus crispatus CTV-05) on genital immunology following standard bacterial vaginosis treatment: results from a immune 17zed, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Microbe. 2022 Jun;3(6):e 435–e 442. doi: 10.1016/S 2666-5247(22)00043-X. Epub 2022 Apr 21. Erratum in: Lancet Microbe. 2022 Jul;3(7):35659905 PMC 9188188 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Balkus JE, Srinivasan S, Anzala O, Kimani J, Andac C, Schwebke J, Fredricks DN, Mc Clelland RS. Impact of Periodic Presumptive Treatment for Bacterial Vaginosis on the Vaginal Microbiome among Women Participating in the Preventing Vaginal Infections Trial. J Infect Dis. 2017 Mar 1;215(5):723–731. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiw 622.28007924 PMC 5853550 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Bradshaw CS, Tabrizi SN, Fairley CK, Morton AN, Rudland E, Garland SM. The association of Atopobium vaginae and Gardnerella vaginalis with bacterial vaginosis and recurrence after oral metronidazole therapy. J Infect Dis. 2006 Sep 15;194(6):828–36. doi: 10.1086/506621. Epub 2006 Aug 16.16941351 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
