# A novel aerosol collection method shows the cough aeromicrobiome of people with tuberculosis is phylogenetically distinct from respiratory tract specimens

**Authors:** Tinaye L. Chiyaka, Georgina R. Nyawo, Charissa Naidoo, Suventha Moodley, Jose C. Clemente, Stephanus T. Malherbe, Robin Warren, David Ku, Leopoldo N. Segal, Grant Theron

PMC · DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4106141/v1 · Research Square · 2024-04-11

## TL;DR

A new method for collecting aerosols shows that the microbes in TB patient coughs are different from those in their sputum or lung samples.

## Contribution

A commercial aerosol collection device reveals a distinct TB patient aeromicrobiome compared to traditional respiratory samples.

## Key findings

- MTBC was more detectable in aerosols than in sputum using sequencing.
- Aerosol samples showed distinct microbial compositions compared to sputum, oral washes, and BALF.
- Mycobacterium was detected in aerosols but not in sputum samples.

## Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB), a major cause of disease and antimicrobial resistance, is spread via aerosols. Aerosols have diagnostic potential and airborne-microbes other than Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) may influence transmission. We evaluated whether PneumoniaCheck (PMC), a commercial aerosol collection device, captures MTBC and the aeromicrobiome of people with TB.

PMC was done in sputum culture-positive people (≥30 forced coughs each, n=16) pre-treatment and PMC air reservoir (bag, corresponding to upper airways) and filter (lower airways) washes underwent Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra) and 16S rRNA gene sequencing (sequencing also done on sputum). In a subset (n=6), PMC microbiota (bag, filter) was compared to oral washes and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF).

54% (7/13) bags and 46% (6/14) filters were Ultra-positive. Sequencing read counts and microbial diversity did not differ across bags, filters, and sputum. However, microbial composition in bags (Sphingobium-, Corynebacterium-, Novosphingobium-enriched) and filters (Mycobacterium-, Sphingobium-, Corynebacterium-enriched) each differed vs. sputum. Furthermore, sequencing only detected Mycobacterium in bags and filters but not sputum. In the subset, bag and filter microbial diversity did not differ vs. oral washes or BALF but microbial composition differed. Bags vs. BALF were Sphingobium-enriched and Mycobacterium-, Streptococcus-, and Anaerosinus-depleted (Anaerosinus also depleted in filters vs. BALF). Compared to BALF, none of the aerosol-enriched taxa were enriched in oral washes or sputum.

PMC captures aerosols with Ultra-detectable MTBC and MTBC is more detectable in aerosols than sputum by sequencing. The aeromicrobiome is distinct from sputum, oral washes and BALF and contains differentially-enriched lower respiratory tract microbes.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** tuberculosis (MONDO:0018076)
- **Species:** Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (taxon 77643), Sphingobium (taxon 165695), Corynebacterium (taxon 1716), Novosphingobium (taxon 165696), Mycobacterium (taxon 1763), Streptococcus (taxon 1301), Anaerosinus (taxon 151037)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** cough (MESH:D003371), TB (MESH:D014376)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Novosphingobium (genus) [taxon 165696], Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (species group) [taxon 77643], Streptococcus (genus) [taxon 1301], Corynebacterium (genus) [taxon 1716], Sphingobium (genus) [taxon 165695]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11042404/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11042404/full.md

## References

27 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11042404/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11042404