Author Correction: A single-cell comparison of adult and fetal human epicardium defines the age-associated changes in epicardial activity
Vincent R. Knight-Schrijver, Hongorzul Davaapil, Semih Bayraktar, Alexander D. B. Ross, Kazumasa Kanemaru, James Cranley, Monika Dabrowska, Minal Patel, Krzysztof Polanski, Xiaoling He, Ludovic Vallier, Sarah Teichmann, Laure Gambardella, Sanjay Sinha
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
- —https://doi.org/10.13039/501100005617BHF Centre of Research Excellence, Oxford (BHF Centre of Research Excellence in Oxford)
- —https://doi.org/10.13039/100004440Wellcome Trust (Wellcome)
- —https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000274British Heart Foundation (BHF)
- —https://doi.org/10.13039/100007449Takeda Science Foundation
- —Wellcome Trust Clinical PhD Fellowship
- —https://doi.org/10.13039/100010269Wellcome Trust (Wellcome)
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCardiovascular Disease and Adiposity · Coronary Artery Anomalies · Congenital heart defects research
Correction to: Nature Cardiovascular Research 10.1038/s44161-022-00183-w. Published online 21 December 2022.
In the version of this article initially published, in the first sentence of the Results, in the first sentence of the Methods subsection “Visium slide and library preparation for spatial transcriptomics and Cell2Location,” and in the legend of Extended Data Fig. 7, fetal ages were incorrectly described as “weeks post-conception” rather than as gestational age. The errors have been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.