# Practice variation in surgical treatment for lumbar degenerative disc disease: exploring regional and hospital factors influencing surgical rates

**Authors:** Juliëtte J. C. M. van Munster, Ilan J. Y. Halperin, Frank H. Ardesch, Wilbert B. van den Hout, Peter Paul G. van Benthem, Wouter Moojen, Wilco C. Peul

PMC · DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-59629-9 · Scientific Reports · 2024-04-23

## TL;DR

This study finds significant regional and hospital differences in surgical treatments for a spinal condition, especially for instrumented fusion surgery.

## Contribution

The study provides current insights into regional and hospital-level variation in surgical treatment for lumbar degenerative disc disease in the Netherlands.

## Key findings

- Instrumented fusion surgery showed a five-fold variation in postal code areas and three-fold in hospital service areas.
- Males were more likely to undergo laminectomy or discectomy, while females were more likely to receive instrumented fusion surgery.
- Opioid prescription and referral status were predictors of receiving surgical treatment.

## Abstract

The presence of significant, unwarranted variation in treatment suggests that clinical decision making also depends on where patients live instead of what they need and prefer. Historically, high practice variation in surgical treatment for lumbar degenerative disc disease (LDDD) has been documented. This study aimed to investigate current regional variation in surgical treatment for sciatica resulting from LDDD. We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of all Dutch adults (>18 years) between 2016 and 2019. Demographic data from Statistics Netherlands were merged with a nationwide claims database, covering over 99% of the population. Inclusion criteria comprised LDDD diagnosis codes and relevant surgical codes. Practice variation was assessed at the level of postal code areas and hospital service areas (HSAs). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to identify variables associated with surgical treatment. Among the 119,148 hospital visitors with LDDD, 14,840 underwent surgical treatment. Practice variation for laminectomies and discectomies showed less than two-fold variation in both postal code and HSAs. However, instrumented fusion surgery demonstrated a five-fold variation in postal code areas and three-fold variation in HSAs. Predictors of receiving surgical treatment included opioid prescription and patient referral status. Gender differences were observed, with males more likely to undergo laminectomy or discectomy, and females more likely to receive instrumented fusion surgery. Our study revealed low variation rates for discectomies and laminectomies, while indicating a high variation rate for instrumented fusion surgery in LDDD patients. High-quality research is needed on the extent of guideline implementation and its influence on practice variation.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** sciatica (MONDO:0024333)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** sciatica (MESH:D012585), LDDD (MESH:D055959)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11039650/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11039650/full.md

## References

22 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11039650/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11039650