Health care utilisation of asylum seekers and refugees in the South-West of Germany

TL;DR

This study examines how asylum seekers and refugees in Germany use health care services, finding that access and needs vary based on factors like language barriers and region of origin.

Contribution

The study provides new insights into health care utilization patterns and the impact of an integrated care facility for asylum seekers and refugees in Germany.

Findings

High revisit rates to the integrated care facility were observed, particularly among older individuals and those from North Africa.

Implementation of the ICF initially reduced emergency department visits but returned to baseline levels during routine operation.

Respiratory infections and musculoskeletal issues were the most common reasons for health care visits.

Abstract

Limited evidence on utilisation of health care by recently arrived asylum seekers and refugees in high-income countries is available. This study aims to describe the implementation of an integrated care facility (ICF) in an initial reception centre and measure the utilisation of care and the influence of operational parameters.

In a retrospective cohort study design, using medical records, we followed inhabitants of a reception centre in Germany between 11.10.2015 and 30.05.2018. We assessed frequency of visits and revisits to a newly established integrated care facility (ICF), and the effects of the ICF on visits to the local emergency department (LED) in the regional tertiary hospital using survival analysis and time series regression. We also explore the influence of operational parameters on the different implementation phases; phase 1: provisional clinic with 1–2 hours of physician presence daily, phase 2: implementation of ICF with 2–4 hours of care by a team of doctors and nurses daily, phase 3: routine running of ICF with daily operational hours of 10am–2pm with care provided by an interdisciplinary team of doctors and nurses.

14,419 total medical visits were recorded from 1,883 persons seeking health care in the ICF. The absolute number of visits per day remained similar over the study period (19·9/day), yet the relative number of visits changed from 2·2 to 15 per 100 inhabitants from phase 2 to 3, respectively. Most visits were due to respiratory infections (612/3080, 20%), and trauma and musculoskeletal conditions (441/3080, 14%). The rate of revisits to ICF was 2·9 per person per month (95%CI 2·9–3), more for those older, female, from North Africa and those with a translator present. The ratio of visits to the LED changed from 0·3/100 inhabitants per day to 0·14/100 inhabitants after implementation of the ICF and back to 0·3/100 inhabitants during the routine running.

Though seasonal variation and referral practices must be considered, a high rate of revisits to the ICF were recorded. While visits to the LED decreased after the implementation of the ICF, visits returned to the pre-ICF levels during the routine running of the ICF. The results show that AS&R require reliable access to health care, yet the needs of specific groups of migrants may be different, especially those with language barriers, minority groups or those from certain regions. As such, care should be migrant sensitive and adapt to the changing needs of the population. Though more research is required to better understand the differing needs of migrants, this study may help to inform guidelines surrounding migrant sensitive standards of care in Germany.

Figures