795 A 12-Year Experience in Lower Extremity Acute Burns Reconstruction
Jose Antonio Arellano, Tiffany Jeong, Mario Alessandri-Bonetti, Hilary Liu, Guy M Stofman, Francesco Egro

TL;DR
This study reviews 12 years of lower extremity burn reconstructions using flaps, finding that free flaps have higher complication rates compared to pedicled flaps.
Contribution
The study provides a detailed analysis of flap reconstruction outcomes for lower extremity acute burns over a 12-year period.
Findings
Free flaps had significantly higher rates of total flap loss and re-operation compared to pedicled flaps.
Free flap complications included 20% total flap loss and 50% re-operation rate.
Pedicled flaps showed lower complication rates and no total flap loss.
Abstract
A paucity of studies investigated the outcomes of flap reconstruction in lower extremity acute burn. The aim of this study is to report outcomes of lower extremity acute burn needing pedicled or free flap coverage. We conducted a retrospective study to review patients with lower extremity acute burns needing either pedicled or free muscle flap coverage between August 2010 and December 2022 at an ABA-certified burn center. Gathered data included demographics, comorbidities, type of injury, total body surface area involved, anatomical location, indication for flap coverage, timing of reconstruction, follow-up, number and type of re-operations, and complications. Chi-square test was used to measure differences in complication rate between pedicled and free flaps. Over a 12-year period, 31 patients underwent 38 muscle flaps for lower extremity acute burn and were included in the study. In…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
