Correction: Predictive models of recurrent implantation failure in patients receiving ART treatment based on clinical features and routine laboratory data
Qunying Fang, Zonghui Qiao, Lei Luo, Shun Bai, Min Chen, Xiangjun Zhang, Lu Zong, Xian-hong Tong, Li-min Wu
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsReproductive System and Pregnancy · Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Correction: Reprod Biol Endocrinol 22, 32 (2024)
10.1186/s12958-024-01203-z
Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported an alignment error in Table 1 and typos found under section headings Correlations of clinical characteristics and laboratory indicators with RIF outcomes; Multivariate analysis of pregnancy assistance in the first cycle of RIF; Fig. 3 caption; Supplementary Material 1 caption and the author’s unit.
Table 1. General clinical data (Corrected)ControlRIFt/X^2^ P (n = 4750)(n = 462)Female Age (years)31.00 ± 3.6633.30 ± 4.146.070 Duration of infertility (years)2.70 ± 2.044.06 ± 2.795.7210 BMI (kg/m^2^)22.92 ± 3.1322.42 ± 3.021.6770.094 Type of infertility29.4080 Primary infertility2590(54.53)191(41.34) Secondary infertility2160(45.47)271(58.66) Diagnosis of infertility Tubal factor3220(67.79)272(58.87)15.1350 PCOS513(10.08)51(11.04)0.250.875 DOR290(6.11)91(19.70)84.6970 Other ovarian factors105(2.21)7(1.52)0.9680.325 Ems430(9.05)76(16.45)26.2860 Number of induced abortions130.3880 03315(69.79)222(48.05) 11050(22.11)137(29.65) ≥2385(8.10)103(22.30)Male Age (years)(X ± S)31.98 ± 4.3734.56 ± 4.725.8210 Type of infertility13.2720 Primary infertility2600(54.74)212(45.89) Secondary infertility2150(45.26)250(54.11) Teratozoospermia175(3.68)20(4.33)0.4860.486 Sperm quality192.8750 Normal2840(59.79)136(29.44) Mild or moderate asthenospermia1025(21.58)218(47.19) Severe asthenospermia320(6.74)49(10.61) Others565(11.89)59(12.76)The data are presented as the mean ± SD or % (n). The data were analysed by ANOVA or the chi-square test and Fisher’s exact testBMI, body mass index; PCOS, polycystic ovarian syndrome; DOR, diminished ovarian reserve; EMs, endometriosis
The heading Correlations of clinical characteristics and laboratory indicators with RIF outcomes, in this part of the results “95% CI, 0.870 to 0.929” was modified to“95% CI, 0.870 ∼ 0.929”.
The heading Correlations of clinical characteristics and laboratory indicators with RIF outcomes, in this part of the results, “95% CI = 0.865➔0.925” modified to“95% CI, 0.865 ∼ 0.925”.
The heading Multivariate analysis of pregnancy assistance in the first cycle of RIF, in this part of the results, “95% CI, 0.597➔0.748” was modified to “95% CI, 0.597 ∼ 0.748”.
In Fig. 3 caption, “0.895 (95% CI = 0.811–0.828)” was modified to“95% CI, 0.865 ∼ 0.925”.
In Supplementary Material 1 caption, “95% CI: 0.597?0.748” was modified to “95% CI, 0.597 ∼ 0.748”.
In author details, “Center for reproductive medicine and prenatal diagnosis ” was modified to “Center for Reproduction and Genetics”.
The original article [1] has been updated.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.