# The efficacy of silver needle therapy for treating low back pain: a protocol for meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

**Authors:** Wangyu Li, Xueru Xu, Rongguo Liu

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1355262 · Frontiers in Medicine · 2024-04-02

## TL;DR

This paper outlines a meta-analysis protocol to evaluate the effectiveness of silver needle therapy in treating low back pain.

## Contribution

The study introduces a systematic approach to assess the clinical efficacy of silver needle therapy through meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

## Key findings

- The study will analyze pain intensity as the primary outcome of silver needle therapy for low back pain.
- Secondary outcomes include disability indices and drug requirements, with bias assessed using the RoB2 tool.

## Abstract

As population aging and unhealthy living habits may exacerbate the prevalence and burden of low back pain (LBP), effective treatment and improvement of patient quality of life are particularly critical. Silver needle therapy (SNT), having evolved from traditional acupuncture, involves placing silver needles into muscles, tendons, and fascia for treatment. However, it still lacks robust clinical evidence to substantiate its effectiveness. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct more emphasis on meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical efficacy of SNT for treating LBP.

We will search PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Databases up until December 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials of SNT treatment in adult patients with LBP. The primary outcome will be the intensity of pain after pain management. Secondary outcomes will include the Oswestry Disability Index, Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire, requirement for analgesic drugs, and treatment-related adverse reactions. Two investigators conducted the literature search, selected studies that might meet the inclusion criteria based on the title and abstract, and extracted data from the eligible literature independently and will independently assess the risk of bias using the Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias (RoB2) tool. Multivariate analyses (including subgroup analysis, trial sequential analysis (TSA), sensitivity analysis, etc.) will be conducted to improve the quality of evidence.

Registration: PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42023466207, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023466207.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** LBP (MESH:D017116), pain (MESH:D010146), Back Pain (MESH:D001416)
- **Chemicals:** Silver (MESH:D012834)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11022203/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11022203/full.md

## References

29 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11022203/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11022203