Longitudinal Studies of Aging in Sub-Saharan Africa: Review, Limitations, and Recommendations in Preparation of Projected Aging Population
Olayinka Akinrolie, Anthony O Iwuagwu, Michael E Kalu, Daniel Rayner, Oluwagbemiga Oyinlola, Chigozie D Ezulike, Augustine C Okoh, Adebayo O Makanju, Ebere P Ugwuodo, Immaculata A Ugwuja, Makanjuola Osuolale John, Deborah Adeleke, Chukwuenyegom J Egbumike, Ebuka Miracle Anieto

TL;DR
This paper reviews longitudinal studies on aging in Sub-Saharan Africa and highlights the need for more longitudinal analyses to inform aging policies.
Contribution
The paper identifies underutilization of longitudinal data in aging research in Sub-Saharan Africa and recommends targeted funding for longitudinal analyses.
Findings
193 studies using 24 longitudinal datasets were identified, with WHO-SAGE and HAALSI being the most used.
Most studies (77.7%) used a cross-sectional approach, limiting understanding of aging changes over time.
Abstract
The United Nations has projected a 218% increase in older people in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) between 2019 and 2050, underscoring the need to explore changes that would occur over this time. Longitudinal studies are ideal for studying and proffering solutions to these changes. This review aims to understand the breadth and use of longitudinal studies on aging in the SSA regions, proffering recommendations in preparation for the projected aging population. This paper is the third of a four-part series paper of a previous systematic mapping review of aging studies in SSA. We updated the search (between 2021 and 2023) and screened the titles/abstracts and full-text articles by a pair of independent reviewers. Data were extracted using a standardized data-charting form, identifying longitudinal studies in SSA. We identified 193 studies leveraging 24 longitudinal study data sets conducted…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsClassical Philosophy and Thought · Philosophical Thought and Analysis · Educational theories and practices
