Variations in inter‐specific and sex‐related niche partitioning in pelagic boobies during their annual cycle
Miriam Lerma, Nina Dehnhard, José Alfredo Castillo‐Guerrero, Salvador Hernández‐Vázquez, Christian C. Voigt, Stefan Garthe

TL;DR
This study shows how two similar seabird species and their sexes partition their ecological niches, especially during breeding, to reduce competition in a tropical marine environment.
Contribution
The study reveals distinct inter- and intra-specific niche partitioning in pelagic boobies, particularly during breeding and in the more dimorphic species.
Findings
Masked and red-footed boobies showed no isotopic niche overlap during breeding but slight overlap during non-breeding.
Female masked boobies had a higher trophic position than males during breeding, unlike red-footed boobies.
Inter- and intra-specific niche partitioning helps these seabirds coexist in the same tropical marine environment.
Abstract
Animals that co‐occur in a region (sympatry) may share the same environment (syntopy), and niche differentiation is expected among closely related species competing for resources. The masked booby (Sula dactylatra) and smaller congeneric red‐footed booby (Sula sula) share breeding grounds. In addition to the inter‐specific size difference, females of both species are also larger than the respective males (reversed sexual size dimorphism). Although both boobies consume similar prey, sometimes in mixed‐species flocks, each species and sex may specialize in terms of their diet or foraging habitats. We examined inter‐ and intra‐specific differences in isotopic values (δ13C and δ15N) in these pelagically feeding booby species during the incubation period at Clarion Island, Mexico, to quantify the degrees of inter‐ and intra‐specific niche partitioning throughout the annual cycle. During…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhotographic and Visual Arts · Media and Digital Communication · Cultural Industries and Urban Development
