Reply
Leonardo Furtado Freitas, Eduardo Carvalho Miranda, Thelma Ribeiro Noce, Aline Pimentel Amaro, Márcio Luís Duarte

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCerebrovascular and genetic disorders
The pathogenicity of variant c.597dup in SLC19A3 and treatability of its phenotype remain unconfirmed
Dear Editor,
Initially, we would like to thank Josef Finsterer and Fulvio Scorza for their comments and for the opportunity to discuss this case report. 1 There is a typing error, and the correct name of the gene in question is SLC19A3, whose inheritance is indeed autosomal recessive.
Genetic exome analysis showed 2 different mutations in the SLC19A3 gene. A pathogenic variant c.597dup p.(His200Serfs*25) and a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) c.488C > T p.(Ser163Phe). These mutations are on different alleles (compound heterozygosity), which would function as homozygosity. This would explain the disease and the variant of uncertain significance should be reclassified as probably pathogenic. So far, therefore, we do not doubt the diagnosis, after a multidisciplinary discussion with a pediatric neurologist and geneticist.
The patient in question did not die, and showed a slight clinical improvement with treatment, despite having sequelae and a very poor prognosis due to the parenchymal changes in the brain, even with high-dose treatment. He is currently taking 500 mg of thiamine and 80 mg of biotin in the morning and 300 mg of thiamine and 40 mg of biotin in the evening.
The parents' genetic tests have been requested but are not yet available at the time of this letter.
We would like to thank you again for the comments and the possibility of corrections and clarifications.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
