# Parameterization of Biomechanical Variables through Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) in Occasional Healthy Runners

**Authors:** Álvaro Pareja-Cano, José María Arjona, Brian Caulfield, Antonio Cuesta-Vargas

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/s24072191 · Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024-03-29

## TL;DR

This study uses IMUs to measure biomechanical variables in runners and finds consistent results across different data sampling methods.

## Contribution

The study introduces a 4-IMU setup for analyzing running biomechanics and shows no significant differences in variables across data sampling strategies.

## Key findings

- Very strong positive associations were found between same-family biomechanical variables.
- Temporal variables were inversely associated with step rate in 30 s and 30 steps of data.
- No significant differences were found in biomechanical variables across different data selections.

## Abstract

Running is one of the most popular sports practiced today and biomechanical variables are fundamental to understanding it. The main objectives of this study are to describe kinetic, kinematic, and spatiotemporal variables measured using four inertial measurement units (IMUs) in runners during treadmill running, investigate the relationships between these variables, and describe differences associated with different data sampling and averaging strategies. A total of 22 healthy recreational runners (M age = 28 ± 5.57 yrs) participated in treadmill measurements, running at their preferred speed (M = 10.1 ± 1.9 km/h) with a set-up of four IMUs placed on tibias and the lumbar area. Raw data was processed and analysed over selections spanning 30 s, 30 steps and 1 step. Very strong positive associations were obtained between the same family variables in all selections. The temporal variables were inversely associated with the step rate variable in the selection of 30 s and 30 steps of data. There were moderate associations between kinetic (forces) and kinematic (displacement) variables. There were no significant differences between the biomechanics variables in any selection. Our results suggest that a 4-IMU set-up, as presented in this study, is a viable approach for parameterization of the biomechanical variables in running, and also that there are no significant differences in the biomechanical variables studied independently, if we select data from 30 s, 30 steps or 1 step for processing and analysis. These results can assist in the methodological aspects of protocol design in future running research.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** COM (MESH:C536030), pain (MESH:D010146), -related injuries (MESH:D014947), rheumatoid, neurological, or degenerative diseases (MESH:D019636), injury to people or property (MESH:C000719191), lumbar diseases or deformities (MESH:C535531), DF (MESH:D005171), lower limb injuries (MESH:D038061), ROM (MESH:D009041), PSD (MESH:D001851), GCT (MESH:D007815)
- **Chemicals:** PPA (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]
- **Cell lines:** S2 — Drosophila melanogaster (Fruit fly), Spontaneously immortalized cell line (CVCL_Z232)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11014260/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11014260/full.md

## References

59 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11014260/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11014260