# The Clinical Impact of the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index on the Length of Hospital Stay of Patients with Pulmonary Embolism: A Randomized Controlled Trial

**Authors:** Marco Paolo Donadini, Nicola Mumoli, Patrizia Fenu, Fulvio Pomero, Roberta Re, Gerardo Palmiero, Laura Spadafora, Valeria Mazzi, Alessandra Grittini, Lorenza Bertù, Drahomir Aujesky, Francesco Dentali, Walter Ageno, Alessandro Squizzato

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14070776 · Diagnostics · 2024-04-07

## TL;DR

A study found that using a specific scoring system for pulmonary embolism did not reduce hospital stays, but patients on newer blood thinners had shorter stays.

## Contribution

This is the first randomized trial to assess the impact of the PESI on hospital length of stay for pulmonary embolism patients.

## Key findings

- Formal use of the PESI did not reduce hospital length of stay compared to standard care.
- Patients treated with DOACs had shorter hospital stays than those on VKAs or heparin.

## Abstract

Background: The Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) is an extensively validated prognostic score, but impact analyses of the PESI on management strategies, outcomes and health care costs are lacking. Our aim was to assess whether the adoption of the PESI for patients admitted to an internal medicine ward has the potential to safely reduce the length of hospital stay (LOS). Methods: We carried out a multicenter randomized controlled trial, enrolling consecutive adult outpatients diagnosed with acute PE and admitted to an internal medicine ward. Within 48 h after diagnosis, the treating physicians were randomized, for every patient, to calculate and report the PESI in the clinical record form on top of the standard of care (experimental arm) or to continue routine clinical practice (standard of care). The ClinicalTrials.gov identifier is NCT03002467. Results: This study was prematurely stopped due to slow recruitment. A total of 118 patients were enrolled at six internal medicine units from 2016 to 2019. The treating physicians were randomized to the use of the PESI for 59 patients or to the standard of care for 59 patients. No difference in the median LOS was found between the experimental arm (8, IQR 6–12) and the standard-of-care arm (8, IQR 6–12) (p = 0.63). A pre-specified secondary analysis showed that the LOS was significantly shorter among the patients who were treated with DOACs (median of 8 days, IQR 5–11) compared to VKAs or heparin (median of 9 days, IQR 7–12) (p = 0.04). Conclusions: The formal calculation of the PESI in the patients already admitted to internal medicine units did not impact the length of hospital stay.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** pulmonary embolism (MONDO:0005279)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Pulmonary Embolism (MESH:D011655)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11011567/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11011567/full.md

## References

29 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11011567/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC11011567