# Does presenting perpetrator and innocent suspect faces from different facial angles influence the susceptibility of eyewitness memory? An investigation into the misinformation effect and eyewitness misidentification

## TL;DR

This study explores how different facial angles of a criminal and a suspect affect eyewitness memory accuracy.

## Contribution

The novelty lies in examining how angle congruency across stages of a misinformation paradigm influences lineup discrimination accuracy.

## Key findings

- Angle congruency between stages did not significantly affect identification errors.
- Front-facing angles improved accuracy compared to profile angles in both the initial event and lineup stages.

## Abstract

This study investigated the effects of face angle congruency across stages of a misinformation paradigm on lineup discrimination accuracy.

In a between-subjects design, participants viewed a mock crime with the perpetrator’s face from the front or profile angle. They then read a news report featuring an innocent suspect’s image from the same or different angle as the perpetrator had been shown. A subsequent lineup manipulated perpetrator presence and viewing angle of the lineup members, who were all shown either from the front or in profile.

No significant difference emerged in identification errors based on angle congruency between stages. However, accuracy was higher when faces were shown from the front angle, both during the initial event and the lineup, compared to the profile angle.

The results of this research underscore the importance of considering viewing angles in the construction of lineups.