Voices of conference attendees: how should future hybrid conferences be designed?
Sai Sreenidhi Ram, Daniel Stricker, Carine Pannetier, Nathalie Tabin, Richard W Costello, Daiana Stolz, Kevin W Eva, Sören Huwendiek

TL;DR
Conference attendees prefer hybrid formats with both in-person and virtual components, emphasizing networking and convenient access to expert content.
Contribution
Identifies attendee preferences for hybrid conferences and provides actionable recommendations for optimizing future hybrid academic meetings.
Findings
56.9% of respondents prefer hybrid conferences, with virtual sessions offered both during and outside the in-person event.
Attendees prioritize live international expert presentations and clinical skills sessions in in-person components.
Virtual components should include live streaming and clinical case discussions for optimal engagement.
Abstract
With conference attendees having expressed preference for hybrid meeting formats (containing both in-person and virtual components), organisers are challenged to find the best combination of events for academic meetings. Better understanding what attendees prioritise in a hybrid conference should allow better planning and need fulfilment. An online survey with closed and open-ended questions was distributed to registrants of an international virtual conference. Responses were then submitted to descriptive statistical analysis and directed content analysis. 823 surveys (Response Rate = 4.9%) were received. Of the 813 who expressed a preference, 56.9% (N = 463) desired hybrid conference formats in the future, 32.0% (N = 260) preferred in-person conferences and 11.1% (N = 90) preferred virtual conferences. Presuming a hybrid meeting could be adopted, 67.4% (461/684) preferred that…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCatholicism and Religious Studies · American Constitutional Law and Politics
