The Temporal Relation Between Rates of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Minimum Rim Width Changes in Glaucoma

TL;DR

This study finds that changes in retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and minimum rim width occur at the same time in glaucoma patients, with no significant delay between them.

Contribution

The study demonstrates that MRW and RNFLT changes are concurrent, offering insights into their use for glaucoma monitoring.

Findings

MRW and RNFLT changes occur concurrently in glaucoma patients.

Models without time lag fit the data better than those with time lag.

RNFLT may be more useful for early glaucoma detection due to lower variability.

Abstract

This study aims to determine whether OCT-derived rates of change in minimum rim width (MRW) are associated with and can potentially predict corresponding alterations in retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) in people with glaucoma.

The rates of change between six-monthly visits were taken from 568 eyes of 278 participants in the P3 Study. Structural equation models (SEM) assessed whether one parameter was predicted by the concurrent or previous rate of the other parameter, after adjusting for its own rate in the previous time interval. Root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA, with 90% confidence intervals [CI]), Tucker Lewis index (TLI) and the comparative fit index (CFI) assessed goodness of fit.

Models without a time lag provided a better fit for the data (RMSEA = 0.101 [CI, 0.089, 0.113]), compared to a model featuring a time lag in RNFLT (RMSEA = 0.114 [CI, 0.102, 0.126]) or MRW (RMSEA = 0.114 [CI, 0.102, 0.127]). The SEMs indicated that rates for both MRW and RNFLT were predicted by their own rate in the previous time interval and by the other measure's change in the concurrent time interval (P > 0.001 for all). No evidence of a clinically significant time lag for either parameter was determined.

MRW and RNFLT exhibit concurrent changes over time in patients with glaucoma, with no clinically significant time lag determined.

RNFLT may be more useful than MRW in early glaucoma assessment because of its previously reported lower variability and reduced sensitivity to intraocular pressure changes.

Figures