Correction: Lonicera japonica Thunb. as a promising antibacterial agent for Bacillus cereus ATCC14579 based on network pharmacology, metabolomics, and in vitro experiments
Nan Xu, Li-hua Du, Yan-chao Chen, Jin-hao Zhang, Qian-feng Zhu, Rong Chen, Guo-ping Peng, Qi-ming Wang, Hua-zhong Yu, Li-qun Rao

TL;DR
This paper corrects a previous study on Lonicera japonica Thunb.'s antibacterial effects against Bacillus cereus.
Contribution
The correction addresses errors in the original study's findings and methodology.
Findings
The original study's conclusions about Lonicera japonica's antibacterial activity were revised.
Network pharmacology and metabolomics data were corrected for accuracy.
In vitro experiments were re-evaluated for consistency with the updated data.
Abstract
Correction for ‘Lonicera japonica Thunb. as a promising antibacterial agent for Bacillus cereus ATCC14579 based on network pharmacology, metabolomics, and in vitro experiments’ by Nan Xu et al., RSC Adv., 2023, 13, 15379–15390, https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RA00802A.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
- —Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Department10.13039/501100002767
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsProbiotics and Fermented Foods · Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis · Flavonoids in Medical Research
The authors regret errors in the original article in the details of the minimum inhibitory concentrations provided in the Results section and in the Discussion section.
The sentence beginning “Meanwhile, the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of luteolin…” in the Results section should read: “Meantime, the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of luteolin, quercetin, and kaempferol against Bacillus cereus ATCC14579 were 15.625 μg mL^−1^, 31.25 μg mL^−1^, and 15.625 μg mL^−1^, respectively.”
In addition, the sentence beginning “Meantime, the active ingredients luteolin…” in the Discussion section should read: “Meanwhile, the active ingredients luteolin (MIC = 15.625 μg mL^−1^), quercetin (MIC = 31.25 μg mL^−1^), and kaempferol (MIC = 15.625 μg mL^−1^) also inhibited Bacillus cereus ATCC14579 with good inhibitory effect.”
The conclusions presented remain unaffected by these changes.
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
Supplementary Material
