Prognostic factors associated with early recurrence following liver resection for colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Yuan Tian, Yaoqun Wang, Ningyuan Wen, Shaofeng Wang, Bei Li, Geng Liu

TL;DR
This study identifies factors that increase the risk of early cancer recurrence after liver surgery for colorectal cancer liver metastases, helping improve patient care and treatment strategies.
Contribution
A comprehensive meta-analysis identifying high-quality evidence for prognostic factors of early recurrence after liver resection for colorectal liver metastases.
Findings
Poor tumor differentiation, bilobar metastases, and major hepatectomy are strongly linked to early recurrence.
High CEA and CA199 levels, lymph node metastases, and surgical complications increase recurrence risk.
30.2% of patients experience early recurrence within 6 months after liver resection.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the 3rd most common malignancy with the liver being the most common site of metastases. The recurrence rate of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) after liver resection (LR) is notably high, with an estimated 40% of patients experiencing recurrence within 6 months. In this context, we conducted a meta-analysis to synthesize and evaluate the reliability of evidence pertaining to prognostic factors associated with early recurrence (ER) in CRLM following LR. Systematic searches were conducted from the inception of databases to July 14, 2023, to identify studies reporting prognostic factors associated with ER. The Quality in Prognostic Factor Studies (QUIPS) tool was employed to assess risk-of-bias for included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed on these prognostic factors, summarized by forest plots. The grading of evidence was based on sample size,…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMedical and Health Sciences Research
