# Expected impact of MRI-targeted biopsy interreader variability among uropathologists on ProScreen prostate cancer screening trial: a pre-trial validation study

**Authors:** Ronja Hietikko, Tuomas Mirtti, Tuomas P. Kilpeläinen, Teemu Tolonen, Anne Räisänen-Sokolowski, Stig Nordling, Jill Hannus, Marita Laurila, Kimmo Taari, Teuvo L. J. Tammela, Reija Autio, Kari Natunen, Anssi Auvinen, Antti Rannikko

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04898-2 · World Journal of Urology · 2024-04-06

## TL;DR

This study evaluates how consistently uropathologists grade prostate cancer biopsies based on MRI scans and finds high agreement in cancer classification.

## Contribution

The study provides pre-trial validation of MRI-targeted biopsy grading consistency among pathologists in a prostate cancer screening trial.

## Key findings

- Inter-reader agreement for cancer vs. benign was excellent (kappa 0.90).
- Agreement for clinically significant prostate cancer was good (kappa 0.70).
- High reproducibility of pathology reporting was observed in MRI-targeted biopsies.

## Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) histology, particularly the Gleason score, is an independent prognostic predictor in PCa. Little is known about the inter-reader variability in grading of targeted prostate biopsy based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The aim of this study was to assess inter-reader variability in Gleason grading of MRI-targeted biopsy among uropathologists and its potential impact on a population-based randomized PCa screening trial (ProScreen).

From June 2014 to May 2018, 100 men with clinically suspected PCa were retrospectively selected. All men underwent prostate MRI and 86 underwent targeted prostate of the prostate. Six pathologists individually reviewed the pathology slides of the prostate biopsies. The five-tier ISUP (The International Society of Urological Pathology) grade grouping (GG) system was used. Fleiss’ weighted kappa (κ) and Model-based kappa for associations were computed to estimate the combined agreement between individual pathologists.

GG reporting of targeted prostate was highly consistent among the trial pathologists. Inter-reader agreement for cancer (GG1–5) vs. benign was excellent (Model-based kappa 0.90, Fleiss’ kappa κ = 0.90) and for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) (GG2–5 vs. GG0 vs. GG1), it was good (Model-based kappa 0.70, Fleiss’ kappa κ 0.67).

Inter-reader agreement in grading of MRI-targeted biopsy was good to excellent, while it was fair to moderate for MRI in the same cohort, as previously shown. Importantly, there was wide consensus by pathologists in assigning the contemporary GG on MRI-targeted biopsy suggesting high reproducibility of pathology reporting in the ProScreen trial.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** prostate cancer (MONDO:0005159)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** cancer (MESH:D009369), PCa (MESH:D011471)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10998811/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10998811/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10998811