ASO Author Reflections: Multivisceral Versus Tumor-Only Resection in Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma
Amblessed Onuma, Leva Gorji, Joal D. Beane

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment · Cardiac tumors and thrombi · Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
Past
Surgical resection of retroperitoneal liposarcoma with grossly negative margins is a good prognostic indicator in the surgical management of this disease.^1,2^ Two operative strategies (tumor-only and multivisceral resection) have evolved through the years. Multivisceral resection involves excision of the tumor in addition to adjacent organ-abutting of the tumor to ensure adequate negative margins, whereas tumor-only resection involves resection of only gross disease. Prior studies have not shown any clear difference between the two operative techniques.^3^
Present
This retrospective study compared the two operative strategies using the win ratio, a novel approach that analyzes the composite end points of two competing approaches.^4^ The advantage of this method is that it prioritizes end points in a hierarchical order to achieve a set benefit. The authors chose 30 day mortality, 90 day mortality, overall survival, and severe complication (defined as readmission within 30 days after surgery) as their end points prioritized in that order. The study found no difference in overall win ratio between the patients who underwent multivisceral resection and those who underwent tumor-only resection in the matched cohort. In subgroup analysis, the patients 72–90 years of age had lower odds of winning if they underwent multivisceral resection instead of tumor-only resection. The patients who had no adjacent tissue involvement of their tumor and underwent multivisceral resection experienced lower odds of winning than those who underwent tumor-only resection.
Future
Due to the retrospective nature of this study, the authors were unable to ascertain the justification for organ resection or the number of organs resected. The results suggest that for a certain age group, multivisceral resection increases morbidity without providing an overall benefit. These findings highlight the need to further optimize patient selection and the appropriate operative approach in the management of retroperitoneal liposarcoma. Future directions include a large-scale, prospective study to improve understanding of the surgical management of this disease.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Park JO Qin L-X Prete FP Antonescu C Brennan MF Singer S Predicting outcome by growth rate of locally recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma: the one centimeter per month rule Ann Surg.200925097798210.1097/sla.0b 013e 3181 b 2468 b 19953716 PMC 3248745 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Chen J Hang Y Gao Q Huang X Surgical diagnosis and treatment of primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma Front Surg.202110.3389/fsurg.2021.67266934150840 PMC 8211986 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Villano AM Zeymo A Nigam A Chan KS Shara N Unger KR Radical excision for retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma: a national propensity-matched outcomes analysis Surg United States.202010.1016/j.surg.2020.05.03132709488 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Gorji L Nikahd M Onuma A Comparing multivisceral resection with tumor-only resection of liposarcoma using the win ratio Ann Surg Oncol.202410.1245/s 10434-024-14985-838347333 PMC 10997686 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
