Corrigendum: Convergence between the dimensional PD models of ICD-11 and DSM-5: a meta-analytic approach
Luis Hualparuca-Olivera, Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, Julio Torales, Dayana Ramos-Campos
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTreatment of Major Depression · Mental Health and Psychiatry · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
In the published article, there was an error in Table 1, 7. Damovsky et al. (35), Column 6. Two incorrect r coefficients were mentioned. Instead of “0.14” and “0.00”, they should be “0.70” and “0.74”, respectively.
In the published article, there was an error in Figure 1. The figure showed incorrect correlation indices for ‘Damovsky et al. (2022), PiCD_DT <-> PID-5-BF+_DT’ and for ‘Damovsky et al. (2022), PiCD_DL <-> PID-5-BF+_ANT’. Instead of “0.14” and “0.00”, it should be “0.70” and “0.74”, respectively.
The correct Figure 1 appears below.
In the published article, there was an error in Supplementary Figure S3. The figure showed incorrect correlation indices for ‘Damovsky et al. (2022), PiCD_DT <-> PID-5-BF+_DT’ and for ‘Damovsky et al. (2022), PiCD_DL <-> PID-5-BF+_ANT’. Instead of “0.14” and “0.00”, it should be “0.70” and “0.74”, respectively.
In the published article, there was an error in 3 Results, 3.1 Description of the chosen studies, Paragraph 2. This sentence previously stated:
“The range of the correlation coefficients r was from 0.31 to 0.74 between the severity measures of both models; and r from 0 to 0.89, between the trait scales of both models.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“The range of the correlation coefficients r was from 0.31 to 0.74 between the severity measures of both models; and r from 0.26 to 0.89, between the trait scales of both models.”
The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.