# Stress Distribution on Prepared Tooth With Shoulder and Radial Shoulder Margin to Receive Crowns of Three Different Materials: A Finite Element Analysis

**Authors:** Shipha Hegde, Anamika Deb, Ban A Almudarris, Rajkiran Chitumalla, Shashank Jaiswal, Satheesh R, Ramesh K Nadiger, Gouri V Anehosur

PMC · DOI: 10.7759/cureus.55538 · Cureus · 2024-03-05

## TL;DR

This study uses computer modeling to compare how different crown materials affect stress on prepared teeth with two types of margins.

## Contribution

The study introduces a finite element analysis comparing stress distribution for PEEK, zirconia, and ceramic crowns on tooth margins.

## Key findings

- PEEK crowns showed the lowest maximum principal stress at the tooth margin.
- Zirconia crowns with shoulder margins had the highest von Mises stress.
- PEEK performed best regardless of the type of margin used.

## Abstract

Aim and background

This study aims to determine the stress distribution on the prepared tooth at the margins with shoulder and radial shoulder finish lines when an occlusal load of 300N was applied to ceramic, zirconia, and polyether ether ketone (PEEK) crowns.

Materials and methods

Six models of mandibular first molar teeth were fabricated. The tooth models were subdivided into two groups with shoulder and radial shoulder margins, respectively (n = 18). The teeth were restored with three different prosthetic crown materials (ceramic, zirconia, and PEEK). To simulate the typical forces experienced by a prosthetic crown material in a lower posterior tooth during chewing and biting, an occlusal load of 300N was applied to each of the samples, and the maximum principal stress (Pmax) and von Mises stress were calculated, respectively. These samples were then compared and evaluated to determine the material best suited as a prosthetic crown material of choice for a lower posterior tooth.

Results

Among the materials used, the maximum principal stress value was the least in PEEK crowns. The von Mises stress value was highest for the zirconia crown with shoulder margin and was least for the PEEK crown with a similar margin.

Conclusion

PEEK as a crown material was found to be a better choice for lower posterior teeth as there was the least maximum principal stress at the margin, irrespective of either shoulder or radial shoulder finish line used.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10993099/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10993099/full.md

## References

15 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10993099/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10993099