# Advancing assessment of responsive feeding environments and practices in child care

**Authors:** Julie E. Campbell, Jessie-Lee D. McIsaac, Margaret Young, Elizabeth Dickson, Sarah Caldwell, Rachel Barich, Misty Rossiter

PMC · DOI: 10.1017/jns.2024.10 · Journal of Nutritional Science · 2024-03-07

## TL;DR

This study evaluates responsive feeding practices in child care settings using new scoring tools to improve children's relationship with food.

## Contribution

The study introduces modified scoring frameworks to assess and document responsive feeding environments in child care.

## Key findings

- Modified EPAO and CELEBRATE scales captured detailed responsive feeding scores across 18 child care rooms.
- High responsiveness was observed in avoiding using food for behavior control and allowing children to self-serve.
- Low responsiveness was noted in areas like educator prompts for water consumption and role modeling during meals.

## Abstract

Child care environments offer an ideal setting for feeding interventions. CELEBRATE Feeding is an approach implemented in child care environments in two Maritime Provinces in Canada to support responsive feeding (RF) to foster children’s self-efficacy, self-regulation, and healthy relationships with food. This study aimed to describe RF in child care using established and enhanced scoring frameworks.

The Environment and Policy Assessment and Observation (EPAO) was modified to reflect RF environments and practices, resulting in our modified EPAO and a CELEBRATE scale. Observations were conducted in 18 child care rooms. Behaviours and environments were scored on both scales, creating 21 RF scores, with a score of ‘3’ indicating the most responsiveness. Descriptive analyses of the scores were conducted. The overall room averages were Mean (M) = 41.00, Standard Deviation (SD) = 7.07 (EPAO), and M = 37.92 SD = 6.50 (CELEBRATE). Most responsive scores among rooms within our EPAO and CELEBRATE scales, respectively, were ‘educators not using food to calm or encourage behaviour’ (M = 2.94, SD = 0.24; M = 2.98, SD = 0.06) and ‘not requiring children to sit at the table until finished’ (M = 2.89, SD = 0.47; M = 2.97, SD = 0.12). The least responsive scores within the EPAO were ‘educator prompts for children to drink water’ (M = 0.78, SD = 0.94) and ‘children self-serving’ (M = 0.83, SD = 0.38). The least responsive in the CELEBRATE scale were ‘enthusiastic role modelling during mealtime’ (M = 0.70, SD = 0.68) and ‘praise of mealtime behaviour unrelated to food intake’ (M = 0.74, SD = 0.55). The CELEBRATE scale captured unique observation information about RF to allow documenting change over time with detailed measurement to inform and support nutrition interventions within child care environments.

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** water (MESH:D014867)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10988165/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10988165/full.md

## References

62 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10988165/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10988165