# Comparison of tet(X4)-containing contigs assembled from metagenomic sequencing data with plasmid sequences of isolates from a cohort of healthy subjects

**Authors:** Yichen Ding, Shuan Er, Abel Tan, Jean-Sebastien Gounot, Woei-Yuh Saw, Linda Wei Lin Tan, Yik Ying Teo, Niranjan Nagarajan, Henning Seedorf

PMC · DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.03969-23 · Microbiology Spectrum · 2024-03-05

## TL;DR

This study compares metagenomic sequencing with cultivation methods to detect the antibiotic resistance gene tet(X4) in healthy individuals' gut microbiota.

## Contribution

The study demonstrates the potential and limitations of metagenomic sequencing for detecting antibiotic resistance genes in clinical samples.

## Key findings

- Metagenomic sequencing detected tet(X4) in 2 out of 109 subjects, while cultivation found it in 10.1%.
- tet(X4)-containing sequences from metagenomic data showed high similarity to plasmid sequences from isolates.
- Cultivation-based methods remain more sensitive for low-abundance antibiotic resistance gene detection.

## Abstract

Recently discovered tet(X) gene variants have provided new insights into microbial antibiotic resistance mechanisms and their potential consequences for public health. This study focused on detection, analysis, and characterization of Tet(X4)-positive Enterobacterales from the gut microbiota of a healthy cohort of individuals in Singapore using cultivation-dependent and cultivation-independent approaches. Twelve Tet(X4)-positive Enterobacterales strains that were previously obtained from the cohort were fully genome-sequenced and comparatively analyzed. A metagenomic sequencing (MS) data set of the same samples was mined for contigs that harbored the tet(X4) resistance gene. The sequences of tet(X4)-containing contigs and plasmids sequences were compared. The presence of the resistance genes floR and estT (previously annotated as catD) was detected in the same cassette in 10 and 12 out of the 12 tet(X4)-carrying plasmids, respectively. MS detected tet(X4)-containing contigs in 2 out of the 109 subjects, while cultivation-dependent analysis previously reported a prevalence of 10.1%. The tet(X4)-containing sequences assembled from MS data are relatively short (~14 to 33 kb) but show high similarity to the respective plasmid sequences of the isolates. Our findings show that MS can complement efforts in the surveillance of antibiotic resistance genes for clinical samples, while it has a lower sensitivity than a cultivation-based method when the target organism has a low abundance. Further optimization is required if MS is to be utilized in antibiotic resistance surveillance.

The global rise in antibiotic resistance makes it necessary to develop and apply new approaches to detect and monitor the prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes in human populations. In this regard, of particular interest are resistances against last-resort antibiotics, such as tigecycline. In this study, we show that metagenomic sequencing can help to detect high abundance of the tigecycline resistance gene tet(X4) in fecal samples from a cohort of healthy human subjects. However, cultivation-based approaches currently remain the most reliable and cost-effective method for detection of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

## Linked entities

- **Genes:** floR (chloramphenicol/florfenicol efflux MFS transporter FloR) [NCBI Gene 57334229], estT (macrolide hydrolase EstT) [NCBI Gene 57334856], CatD (cathepsin D) [NCBI Gene 692768]
- **Species:** Enterobacterales (taxon 91347)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** antibiotic (MESH:D004761)
- **Chemicals:** tigecycline (MESH:D000078304)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Enterobacterales (order) [taxon 91347]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10986321/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10986321/full.md

## References

29 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10986321/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10986321