# National Beef Quality Audit-2022 Phase 1: face-to-face and digital interviews

**Authors:** Colton L Smith, Tyler W Thompson, Keayla Harr, Macey Goretska, Thachary R Mayer, Trent E Schwartz, Sydni E Borders, Kerri B Gehring, Phil D Bass, Morgan M Pfeiffer, Gretchen G Mafi, Dustin L Pendell, J Brad Morgan, Davey B Griffin, Jeffrey W Savell, John A Scanga, Mahesh N Nair, Keith E Belk

PMC · DOI: 10.1093/tas/txae034 · Translational Animal Science · 2024-03-12

## TL;DR

The 2022 National Beef Quality Audit found that food safety is now a market expectation, and cattle genetics and eating satisfaction are closely linked in beef purchasing decisions.

## Contribution

This study provides updated insights into the U.S. beef industry's quality factors and market expectations through interviews with industry stakeholders.

## Key findings

- Food safety is now considered a market expectation rather than a purchasing criterion.
- Cattle genetics and eating satisfaction are closely related in purchasing decisions.
- Environmental concerns are seen as a major threat to the beef industry.

## Abstract

The National Beef Quality Audit (NBQA) has been conducted regularly since 1991 to assess and benchmark quality in the U.S. beef industry, with the most recent iteration conducted in 2022. The goal of NBQA Phase I is to evaluate what needs to be managed to improve beef quality and demand. Interviews (n = 130) of industry personnel were conducted with the aid of routing software. In total, packers (n = 24), retailers (n = 20), further processors (n = 26), foodservice (n = 18), and allied government agencies and trade organizations (n = 42) were interviewed. Interviews were routed in software based on interviewee involvement in either the fed steer and heifer market cow and bull sectors, or both. Interviews were structured to elicit random responses in the order of determining “must-have” criteria (quality factors that are required to make a purchase), best/worst ranking (of quality factors based on importance), how interviewees defined quality terms, a strength, weakness, opportunities, threats (SWOT) analysis, general beef industry questions, and sustainability goals (the latter four being open-ended). Quality factors were 1) visual characteristics, 2) cattle genetics, 3) food safety, 4) eating satisfaction, 5) animal well-being, 6) weight and size, and 7) lean, fat, and bone. Best/worst analysis revealed that “food safety” was the most (P < 0.05) important factor in beef purchasing decisions for all market sectors and frequently was described as “everything” and “a way of business.” Culture surrounding food safety changed compared to previous NBQAs with interviewees no longer considering food safety as a purchasing criterion, but rather as a market expectation. The SWOT analysis indicated that “eating quality of U.S. beef” was the greatest strength, and cited that educating both consumers and producers on beef production would benefit the industry. Irrespective of whether companies’ products were fed or market cow/bull beef, respondents said that they believed “environmental concerns” were among the major threats to the industry. Perceived image of the beef industry in the market sectors has improved since NBQA-2016 for both fed cattle and market cow/bull beef.

The interviews portion of the National Beef Quality Audit revealed that food safety has become mandatory in the market, while cattle genetics and eating satisfaction were closely related for many. The beef industry was viewed favorably among the market segments, with suggestions for improvement including producer education and new marketing opportunities.

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Bos taurus (bovine, species) [taxon 9913]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10983070/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10983070/full.md

## References

30 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10983070/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC10983070