# Academic Advising at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Gezira During 2021-2022

## TL;DR

This study evaluates the academic advising system at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Gezira, identifying challenges and suggesting improvements for better student and advisor satisfaction.

## Contribution

The study provides a detailed assessment of academic advising challenges and proposes targeted solutions to enhance the advising system in a medical faculty.

## Key findings

- Most advisors were satisfied, but challenges included student disinterest and inadequate training.
- Students reported difficulty coordinating meetings and perceived a lack of benefit from advising.
- Training advisors, reducing workload, and using technology are suggested to improve the system.

## Abstract

Background

Since its inception, the Faculty of Medicine at Gezira University has recognized the critical role of academic advising in supporting student success. This commitment translates into a well-established advising system, fully integrated into the academic regulations and subject to continuous evaluation and improvement for maximum effectiveness and relevance. Regular orientation sessions ensure that both faculty and students are equipped to make the most of this valuable resource. However, medical students navigate a demanding path filled with unique challenges that require a robust advising program. While Gezira University has built a strong foundation, it is important to identify potential areas for further development and address any existing barriers that may prevent the system from reaching its full potential. This study was conducted to assess the academic advising program at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Gezira during the academic year 2021-2022.

Methodology

In this cross-sectional study, self-administered questionnaires were distributed among academic advisors and a sample of students at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Gezira. The advisors’ questionnaire inquired about their specialty, experience in teaching and academic advising, and other variables related to advising commitment, satisfaction, and interventions that can improve the advisors’ performance. The students’ questionnaire inquired about their batches, sex, grade point average, orientation about academic advising, communication with the advisor, satisfaction, and challenges facing the advising process.

Results

The study enrolled 70 advisors and 502 students. Most advisors were satisfied (65.7%, n = 46). The challenges facing academic advisors included the non-interest of students and inadequate training (68.6%, n = 48), lack of proper settings (65.7%, n = 46), and shortage of faculty members (60%, n = 42). About 52% (n = 261) of the students showed overall satisfaction with the advising service. The most perceived challenges by students were the difficulty of coordinating meetings (71.9%, n = 361), non-interest of the advisors (46%, n = 231), lack of benefit (16.9%, n = 85), and non-orientation of the advisors about academic rules (13.7%, n = 69).

Conclusions

The main challenges faced by academic advisors were students’ lack of interest and inadequate training, lack of appropriate settings, and lack of faculty members, while students’ perceived challenges were difficulty in coordinating meetings, advisors’ lack of interest, lack of benefit, and advisors’ lack of orientation to academic rules. The causes underlying the advisors’ and students’ dissatisfaction with academic advising should be addressed to increase their satisfaction rates. The reported barriers can be overcome by implementing an advisors’ training plan, reducing their workload, using technology, and orienting the students about the importance of academic advising and the benefits they can gain.