# Social Impacts of the American Red Cross (ARC) Disaster Interventions: A Scoping Review

## TL;DR

This study reviews the social impact of the American Red Cross's disaster interventions and finds mostly positive effects, but identifies gaps in recovery efforts.

## Contribution

The study provides the first formal evaluation of the American Red Cross's social impact through a scoping review of academic literature.

## Key findings

- ARC's disaster interventions have a mostly positive social impact on communities before, during, and after disasters.
- Research gaps exist in ARC's recovery interventions, particularly regarding their impact on evacuees.
- The review identified key themes in disaster preparedness and on-site interventions by ARC.

## Abstract

The American Red Cross (ARC) self-reports post-disaster efforts annually, potentially biased for public image. The lack of formal reviews of ARC interventions' social impacts further exacerbates the issue. This scoping review aims to address both issues by summarizing and evaluating the social impact of ARC’s national disaster interventions. As a secondary objective, this review will also provide important information to guide ARC and other organizations in truly fulfilling their missions.

The inclusion criteria involve participants of all age groups, marginalized communities, displaced individuals, and ARC disaster responders. Opinionated statements, except for anecdotes, were excluded. This review involves all United States (US) areas that have been affected by disasters and required assistance from ARC. With no search limits, all evidence was searched on PubMed from July to August 2023. Two stages of screening were conducted by two independent reviewers: title/abstract screening and full-text screening. During each stage, each paper underwent a quality assessment. Disagreements in each stage were resolved before proceeding to the next stage.

Through 22 academic papers, the review outlines key themes in ARC comprehensive interventions on disaster preparedness and on-site disaster interventions. However, research gaps were found in ARC recovery interventions, especially their impact on evacuees.

This investigation found that ARC makes general efforts to address the needs of communities they assist before, during, and after disasters. Because the results suggest that ARC is moving in the correct direction in reducing the nationwide harm disasters cause, ARC's social impact on studied populations is mostly positive.