# From neighborhood to household: connections between neighborhood vacant and abandoned property and family violence

## TL;DR

Neighborhoods with many vacant and abandoned properties are linked to higher rates of family violence, including child maltreatment and intimate partner violence.

## Contribution

This study identifies a novel association between vacant properties and family violence, suggesting neighborhood-level interventions could reduce these issues.

## Key findings

- Children in neighborhoods with high vacant property rates are over twice as likely to experience maltreatment.
- Women in such neighborhoods are more than twice as likely to report intimate partner violence.
- Collective efficacy does not mediate the relationship between vacant properties and family violence.

## Abstract

Rates of family violence, including intimate partner violence (IPV) and child maltreatment, remain high in the U.S. and contribute to substantial health and economic costs. How neighborhood environment may influence family violence remains poorly understood. We examine the association between neighborhood vacant and abandoned properties and family violence, and the role collective efficacy may play in that relationship. Data were used from a longitudinal cohort of 218 maternal-child dyads in a southern U.S. city known for elevated rates of violence. Women were matched on their propensity score, for living in a neighborhood with elevated vacant and cited properties. Analyses accounting for clustering in neighborhood and matched groups were conducted to examine the association between neighborhood vacant and abandoned property and family violence, and the potential mediating relationship of collective efficacy. The likelihood of experiencing child maltreatment at 12-months of age was more than twice as high for children living in neighborhoods with a high vacant and cited property rates compared to women living in neighborhoods with fewer vacant and cited properties (OR=2.11, 95% CI=1.03, 4.31). Women living in neighborhoods characterized by high levels of vacant and cited properties were also more than twice as likely to report IPV (OR=2.52, 95% CI=1.21, 5.25). Associations remained mostly stable after controlling for key covariates. Collective efficacy did not act as a mediator in the relationship between vacant and cited properties and family violence. Reducing neighborhood vacant and cited properties may be an important target for interventions focused on reducing family violence.