Correlation Between Volume and Pressure of Intracranial Space With Craniectomy Surface Area and Brain Herniation: A Phantom-Based Study

TL;DR

This study uses a phantom model to explore how intracranial volume and pressure relate to craniectomy size and brain herniation, aiming to improve surgical decision-making.

Contribution

The paper introduces a novel phantom-based model to study the relationship between intracranial volume, pressure, craniectomy surface area, and brain herniation.

Findings

A 10-cm-diameter craniectomy defect caused a midline shift of 5 mm with a 35 mL volume differential.

Brain herniation reduced pressure in both ipsilateral and contralateral sacs from 35/33 mm Hg to 25/24 mm Hg.

The model's results matched those of other model-based studies, suggesting potential for pre-surgical planning.

Abstract

There are proponents of decompressive craniectomy (DC) and its various modifications who claim reasonable clinical outcomes for each of them. Clinical outcome in cases of traumatic brain injury, managed conservatively or aided by different surgical techniques, depends on multiple factors, which vary widely among patients and have complex interplay, making it difficult to compare one case with another in absolute terms. This forms the basis of the perceived necessity to have a standard model to study, compare, and strategize in this field. We designed a phantom-based model and present the findings of the study aimed at establishing a correlation of the volume of intracranial space and changes in intracranial pressure (ICP) with surface area of the craniectomy defect created during DC and brain herniation volume. A roughly hemispherical radio-opaque container was scanned on a 128-slice computed tomography scanner. Craniectomies of different sizes and shapes were marked on the walls of the phantom. Two spherical sacs of stretchable materials were subsequently placed inside the phantom, fixed to three-way connectors, filled with water, and connected with transducers. The terminals of the transducer cables were coupled with the display monitor through a signal amplifier and processor module. Parts of the wall of the phantom were removed to let portions of the sac herniate through the defect, simulating a DC. Volume measurements using AW volume share 7® software were done. Resection of a 12.7 × 11.5 cm part of the wall resulted in a 10-cm-diameter defect in the wall. Volume differential of 35 mL created a midline shift of 5 mm to the side with lesser volume. When measuring pressure in two stretchable sacs contained inside the phantom, there always remained a pressure differential ranging from 1 to 2 mm Hg in different recordings, even with sacs on both sides containing an equal volume of fluids. Creating a circular wall defect of 10 cm in diameter with an intracavitary pressure of 35 mm Hg on the ipsilateral sac and 33 mm on the contralateral sac recorded with intact walls, resulted in a true volume expansion of 48.411 cm3. The herniation resulted in a reduction of pressure in both sacs, with the pressure recorded as 25 mm in the ipsilateral sac and 24 mm in the contralateral sac. The findings closely matched those of the other model-based studies. Refinement of the materials used is likely to provide a valid platform to study cranial volume, ICP, craniectomy size, and brain prolapse volume in real time. The model will help in pre-operatively choosing the most appropriate technique between a classical DC, a hinge craniotomy, and an expansive cranioplasty technique in cases of refractory raised ICP.

Figures