Musculoskeletal Pitfalls on Molecular Imaging Studies of Oncologic Patients: How to Stay Out of Trouble
Brooke Sarna, Ty Subhawong, Efrosyni Sfakianaki, Richard Wang, Anna Christodoulou-Vega, Fabiano N. Cardoso

TL;DR
This paper reviews common benign musculoskeletal findings in cancer patients' molecular imaging to avoid misdiagnosis and unnecessary procedures.
Contribution
The paper provides pictorial examples and diagnostic features to distinguish benign from malignant musculoskeletal findings in oncologic imaging.
Findings
Benign musculoskeletal pathologies can mimic malignancies on molecular imaging.
Specific imaging features help differentiate benign from malignant processes.
Avoiding unnecessary invasive procedures is achievable with proper imaging interpretation.
Abstract
An increasing amount of molecular imaging studies are ordered each year for an oncologic population that continues to expand and increase in age. The importance of these studies in dictating further care for oncologic patients underscores the necessity of differentiating benign from malignant findings, particularly for a population in whom incidental findings are common. The aim of this review is to provide pictorial examples of benign musculoskeletal pathologies which may be found on molecular imaging and which may be mistaken for malignant processes. Imaging examples are provided in the form of radiographs, bone scintigraphy, computed tomography, and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) scans. Special attention is paid to specific features that help narrow the differential diagnosis and distinguish benign from malignant…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMedical Imaging and Pathology Studies · Heterotopic Ossification and Related Conditions · Management of metastatic bone disease
1. Introduction
Nuclear medicine imaging, in particular bone scintigraphy and positron emission tomography (PET), plays a critical role in the diagnosis and management of oncology patients—a role that will only continue to grow in the future. In the next ten years, the number of individuals living at least ten years after their cancer diagnosis is projected to increase by 22.4%, and 74% of cancer survivors will be over the age of 65 [1].
Alongside treatment advancements, imaging techniques continue to evolve as well. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can now be combined with PET for high-resolution full-body scanning. The emergence of targeted radiotracers has enhanced detection of particular cancers, and improved scanning hardware and image reconstruction algorithms have reduced exam times with less radiation and fewer artifacts [2].
With the continued growth of molecular imaging of oncology patients, the dilemma of incidental findings becomes of increasing concern. In this paper, we aim to provide a pictorial review of both common and uncommon benign musculoskeletal pathologies that may be incidentally found on bone scintigraphy and PET scans, and which may mimic malignancies. In many of the illustrated cases, biopsies were performed that may have otherwise been avoided with increased recognition of these benign pathologies. Familiarity with their key imaging features would improve staging accuracy and guide appropriate management. All of the images included in this work are sourced from the authors’ own databases.
2. Bone
2.1. Fracture
Incidental insufficiency fractures (IFs) are increasingly detected on surveillance and re-staging studies as therapeutic advances continue to extend the lives of oncology patients [3]. Factors including osteoporosis, malnutrition, and frailty are associated with higher risk of acute fractures [3], with chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT) in particular predisposing oncology patients to IFs. Although the exact incidence after RT is not known, prior studies reveal a wide range of incidences from 8 to 45% [4], and there is correlation with age and type of cancer treated [4,5]. In some studies, evidence of IFs were found in up to 89% of post-RT MRIs and 34% of post-RT bone scans [6,7].
Fractures may persist for a minimum of 5 months on nuclear medicine bone scans, with only 90% fully resolving after 2 years [8]. The Honda sign (or “H” sign) has been described as a classic presentation of sacral IFs on bone scans, although it may only be found in less than half of all cases [9] (Figure 1). Characteristics of IFs on combined positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) vary with age and location; however, the mean standard uptake value (SUV) tends to range between 1.4 and 2.5 [10,11]. In contrast, Shin et al. showed a maximum mean SUV (SUVmax) of 12.0 among 19 malignant pathologic fractures [12]. In equivocal cases of sacral IFs, MRI can be helpful in delineating distinguishing features such as vertically oriented trabecular fracture lines on fat-suppressed coronal T2-weighted sequences [13].
2.2. Fibrous Dysplasia
Fibrous dysplasia (FD) is a benign mesenchymal tumor caused by a post-zygotic missense mutation in the GNAS gene resulting in the proliferation of fibroblast-like spindle cells associated with immature woven bone [14]. About 80% of lesions occur in only one bone (monostotic) (Figure 2) with a minority of cases occurring in multiple bones (polyostotic) (Figure 3). The most common locations include the ribs, followed by the femurs, and finally the craniofacial bones [15]. FD lesions display focal uptake on bone scintigraphy but can have variable uptake on fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT (in this paper abbreviated as FDG PET/CT), ranging from 1.2 to 9.6 [16], which likely depends on the amount of active fibroblasts. The lesions may also show uptake on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT imaging [17]. While a thick sclerotic rim and “ground-glass” matrix of woven bone are characteristic of FD, imaging manifestations are protean and may represent only one component of a complex multi-organ disease [18,19].
2.3. Enchondroma
Enchondromas are the most common cartilaginous bone tumors and comprise roughly 13% of benign bone tumors [20]. The most common features include “ring and arc” or stippled patterns of chondroid calcification, with well-defined margins and little, if any, endosteal scalloping [21]. In the small tubular bones of the hands and feet, enchondromas may lack matrix mineralization [22]. Like many benign bone tumors, enchondromas may display focal uptake on bone scintigraphy and FDG PET/CT (Figure 4). Distinguishing enchondroma and chondrosarcoma (particularly when they are low-grade) remains a diagnostic dilemma [23], although enchondromas tend to have less intense radiotracer uptake on both bone scans and FDG PET with an average SUVmax of 1.6 versus 4.4 for chondrosarcoma [24]. While some features overlap, findings of deep endosteal scalloping, cortical breakthrough, bony expansion, and paucity of matrix calcifications should raise concern for atypical enchondroma/low-grade chondrosarcoma [23,25]. In general, increased uptake, periosteal reaction, cortical defects, associated soft tissue masses, and peritumoral edema should prompt concern for a malignant lesion [26], but otherwise incidentally discovered asymptomatic long bone enchondromas rarely warrant additional work-up [27].
2.4. Schmorl’s Node
A Schmorl’s node is an intraspongious herniation of the nucleus pulposus through the cartilaginous and bony endplate of adjacent vertebrae. With prevalence in the general population as high as 76% [28], they are often considered incidental findings, though they may be symptomatic in some cases [29]. The formation of a Schmorl’s node entails localized inflammation and osteonecrosis [30], resulting in positive focal uptake on bone scintigraphy and FDG PET/CT that can be mistaken for metastatic disease (Figure 5). As they progress through their natural history, these nodes may have SUVs ranging from 1.09 [31] to as high as 5.7 [32], and can also cause focal uptake on DOTATATE PET/CT imaging [33]. Compared to vertebral metastases, Schmorl’s nodes may show higher peripheral FDG uptake and may show a mismatch between CT and PET in which the area of uptake on FDG PET appears smaller in size than the lesion on CT [32].
2.5. Vertebral Hemangioma
Vertebral hemangiomas (VH) are the most common primary spine tumor and may occur in up to 11% of individuals [34,35]. Due to their heterogenous make-up of fat and vessels, they can have a wide range of appearances ranging from typical quiescent lesions to atypical lesions with rapid growth, interstitial edema, and extension beyond the vertebral body [36]. Lesions with rapid growth in particular may raise suspicion for atypical hemangiomas such as epithelioid hemangioendothelioma [37]. Though VHs also display varying appearance on nuclear medicine imaging, VHs are one of the few lesions discussed in this review that may appear photopenic on bone scintigraphy [38,39]. The comparatively variable nature of VHs can result in a wide array of combined bone scan and FDG PET/CT findings, including increased uptake on both, decreased uptake on both, and increased uptake on FDG PET/CT with normal uptake on bone scan [40]. Despite this variability, they can be distinguished by a “polka dot” or “corduroy” appearance on CT scan, and the preservation of intralesional fat on MRI [36] (Figure 6).
2.6. Paget’s Disease
Paget’s disease of bone (PD) is characterized by disordered bone remodeling, commonly affecting the pelvis, lower extremities, lumbar spine, and skull, with prevalence as high as 5% in women and 8% in men by 70 years of age [41]. It rarely occurs in those under 55 years old. Unlike other incidental bone lesions, PD tends to be non-geographic and usually affects the entirety of a bone. Depending on the stage in the disease’s natural history, there is variable uptake on bone scan, and a bone scan may be positive before any radiography findings are evident [42]. Similarly, FDG and PSMA PET/CT may show diffuse low to moderate SUV uptake, with SUVmax typically > 5 [21,43,44] (Figure 7). CT reveals diffuse trabecular and cortical thickening and bony expansion. When PD occurs in isolated vertebrae, it may be easily mistaken for an osteoblastic metastatic process (Figure 8).
3. Muscle and Tendon
3.1. Enthesopathy
Enthesopathy represents a pathologic process occurring at the sites of tendon, capsule, fascia, or ligament insertions. Its etiology can be multifactorial and includes degenerative changes, trauma, or inflammation (for example, related to rheumatoid arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis) [45]. As an inflammatory process involving hyperostosis, sites of enthesopathy will be apparent as areas of focal radiotracer uptake in areas of ligamentous and tendinous attachments on bone scintigraphy and FDG PET/CT (Figure 9). In fact, these areas may display uptake on FDG PET/CT before any other radiologically apparent findings, with SUVs typically in the range of 1.02–1.35 in early stages [46]. In patients with concomitant rheumatoid arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis, these values may be even higher, up to 4.76 [46].
3.2. Myositis Ossificans
Myositis ossificans (MO) is a dysregulated response most commonly related to muscular injury; however, in many cases a history of trauma need not be present [47]. Although the exact pathophysiology is not known, MO is understood to progress through three stages over the course of 12 or more weeks: early, intermediate, and mature [48]. Accordingly, radiologic findings will differ depending on the stage of MO (Figure 10). In theory, an area of MO will display uptake on bone scintigraphy until matured; however, MO lesions may display chronic uptake even after maturity [49]. FDG PET/CT will show corresponding increased uptake, with SUVs as high as 13, and a general decrease in uptake over time as the lesion matures [50]. MO should be distinguished by its zonal peripheral calcification that develops with increasing maturity of the lesion [51].
3.3. Calcific Tendinopathy
Calcific tendinopathy (CaT) involves the deposition of calcium phosphate crystals within tendons with a surrounding inflammatory reaction. Though it most commonly occurs in the rotator cuff tendons of the shoulder, particularly the supraspinatus [52], it has been found in a variety of tendons, including those of the gluteal muscles [53] as well as other lower extremity muscles that insert on the femur [54]. In up to 40% of cases, there may be osseous findings including cortical erosion, subchondral sclerosis, and bone marrow edema, and virtually all cases will display focal uptake on bone scintigraphy [54] and FDG PET/CT (Figure 11). The identification of amorphous calcium deposits within tendons at the enthesis will differentiate CaT from potentially malignant pathologies.
4. Joint
4.1. Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor/Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis
Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a locally aggressive neoplasm within the synovium, bursa, and tendon sheath, historically referred to as pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS). TGCT/PVNS can have intense uptake on FDG PET/CT, with average maximum SUVs of 8.7 [55] to 11.3 [56]. The most characteristic feature of TGCT/PVNS is its intra-articular location, where it is exceedingly rare for a primary sarcoma or metastasis to originate. If focal intra-articular FDG uptake is associated with an isolated soft tissue mass on FDG PET/CT, MRI should be obtained for further evaluation, as TGCT/PVNS has a distinct heterogeneously low signal intensity on T1 and T2 weighted imaging due to hemosiderin deposits [57] and may occur more commonly than is generally appreciated [58] (Figure 12).
4.2. Adhesive Capsulitis
Adhesive capsulitis (AC) affects anywhere from 2 to 5% of the population and presents with acute or insidious shoulder pain [59]. Waldburger et al. found that almost 100% of bone scintigraphy studies will show uptake in the shoulder area; about one-third of uptake is diffuse, and about two-thirds of uptake is localized to the antero-medial border of the head of the humerus, the acromioclavicular joint, and the coracoid process [60] (Figure 13). Incidental AC has a prevalence of about 0.5% on FDG PET/CT, which will show C-shaped or dot-appearance focal uptake in the rotator interval, axillary recess, and anterior joint capsule, with SUVs up to 5.8 [61]. If PET/CT findings are equivocal, MRI can be performed to identify thickening and edema of the coracohumeral ligament, inferior glenohumeral ligament, and rotator interval joint capsule to confirm the diagnosis [62].
4.3. Acute Calcific Discitis
Calcific discitis (CD) is an incredibly rare entity in adults, and most understanding of the disease is the result of studies in pediatric populations, in whom the disease is more common [63,64]. It is typically a self-limiting condition presenting with pain, fever, and elevated inflammatory markers that develops and resolves over the course of a few weeks, with a majority of cases resolved at 6 months [65]. Radiologically, it is characterized by disc calcifications, usually at one vertebral level, though it may affect multiple levels in 30–40% of cases [66]. This may be associated with endplate erosion and bone marrow edema on CT and MRI, respectively. CD can be differentiated from degenerative Schmorl’s nodes by the eventual reconstitution of vertebral endplates with no loss of body height. The appearance of CD on PET/CT has not been extensively studied; however, it is reasonable to surmise that FDG PET/CT would show focal uptake in the area of CD with gradual reduction in SUV as the CD resolves over weeks or months. One such example is illustrated in Figure 14.
5. Soft Tissue
5.1. Fat Necrosis
Fat necrosis is the result of disruption of the local blood supply of adipose cells and can result after trauma, surgery, biopsy, radiotherapy, and anticoagulation treatment. Its wide array of etiologies means that fat necrosis can be a common finding in patients with a vast number of cancers. Though commonly occurring in the breast, fat necrosis can be seen in almost any adipose tissue in the body including the soft tissues of the extremities. Imaging findings will vary with the age of the lesion, which may show variable SUV uptake ranging from 1.1 to 13.2 [67,68], though there is often identifiable macroscopic fat (Figure 15). Because it can occur along surgical scars or sites of trauma, fat necrosis may be mistaken for recurrent disease along a surgical bed.
5.2. Brown Fat Activation
In contrast to fat necrosis, brown fat activation is a physiologic process with a more diffuse distribution on FDG PET/CT. The SUV may be equally variable, ranging from 0.4 to 12.4 (mean 4.6) [69]; however, brown fat activation should be distinguished by its occurrence in characteristic locations in the cervical, supraclavicular, axillary, and paravertebral regions (Figure 16).
5.3. Hibernoma
Hibernomas and benign tumors of brown fat most commonly occur in the third decade of life [70]. Unlike physiologic brown fat activation, hibernomas will display focal, asymmetric, and mass-like FDG uptake within a well-circumscribed adipocytic tumor (Figure 17). Their SUVs have been reported to range from 2.7 to 24.3, sharing morphologic features of low-grade lipomatous tumors and functional metabolic activity with high-grade liposarcomas [71,72]. However, the combination of a purely lipomatous mass with strong FDG avidity (SUVmax > 10) is virtually pathognomonic for hibernoma [72]. Notably, hibernomas lack the MDM2 amplification seen in well-differentiated liposarcoma/atypical lipomatous tumors [73].
6. Conclusions
There are a variety of benign incidental musculoskeletal conditions that can mimic neoplastic disease. As the number of oncology patients continues to grow, and the number of nuclear medicine scans along with them, there will be an increasing number of incidental pathologies found on these scans. Enhanced recognition of these disease entities may aid physicians in preventing unnecessary invasive procedures and providing reassurance to patients.
Similarly, imaging technology continues to advance and new radiopharmaceuticals, contrast agents, imaging protocols, and scanner types will continue to emerge. With regard to the findings described in this paper, imaging characteristics and clinical interpretation should not be impacted at different facilities provided image acquisition follows American College of Radiology (ACR) accredited facility guidelines, with appropriate radiopharmaceutical dose, camera peak, reconstruction, and post-processing. At the authors’ institutions, Omnipaque (iohexol) is used as an intravenous CT contrast agent and MultiHance (gadobenate dimeglumine) as an intravenous MRI contrast agent. With time, molecular imaging studies with receptor specific imaging such as iodine-131, fluoroestradiol F18, gallium 68/copper 64 DOTATATE, and gallium 68 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) may provide future clinical utility to clarify imaging findings and aid in diagnosis.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Miller K.D. Nogueira L. Devasia T. Mariotto A.B. Yabroff K.R. Jemal A. Kramer J. Siegel R.L. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2022 CA Cancer J. Clin.20227240943610.3322/caac.2173135736631 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Tan H. Gu Y. Yu H. Hu P. Zhang Y. Mao W. Shi H. Total-Body PET/CT: Current Applications and Future Perspectives AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.202021532533710.2214/AJR.19.2270532551910 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Edwards B.J. Sun M. Zhang X. Holmes H.M. Song J. Khalil P. Karuturi M. Shah J.B. Dinney C.P. Gagel R.F. Fractures frequently occur in older cancer patients: The MD Anderson Cancer Center experience Support. Care Cancer 2018261561156810.1007/s 00520-017-3962-729197959 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Oh D. Huh S.J. Insufficiency fracture after radiation therapy Radiat. Oncol. J.20143221322010.3857/roj.2014.32.4.21325568849 PMC 4282995 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Chung Y.K. Lee Y.K. Yoon B.H. Suh D.H. Koo K.H. Pelvic Insufficiency Fractures in Cervical Cancer After Radiation Therapy: A Meta-Analysis and Review In Vivo 2021351109111510.21873/invivo.1235633622908 PMC 8045108 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Blomlie V. Rofstad E.K. Talle K. Sundfør K. Winderen M. Lien H.H. Incidence of radiation-induced insufficiency fractures of the female pelvis: Evaluation with MR imaging AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.19961671205121010.2214/ajr.167.5.89111818911181 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Abe H. Nakamura M. Takahashi S. Maruoka S. Ogawa Y. Sakamoto K. Radiation-induced insufficiency fractures of the pelvis: Evaluation with 99m Tc-methylene diphosphonate scintigraphy AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.199215859960210.2214/ajr.158.3.17390021739002 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Matin P. The appearance of bone scans following fractures, including immediate and long-term studies J. Nucl. Med.19792012271231536788 · pubmed ↗
